BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21382122)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts due to metallic foreign bodies.
    Hecht S; Adams WH; Narak J; Thomas WB
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 21382122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging metallic artifact of commonly encountered surgical implants and foreign material.
    Sutherland-Smith J; Tilley B
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 22277053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Options for the reduction of magnetic susceptibility artifacts caused by implanted microchips in 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging].
    Piesnack S; Oechtering G; Ludewig E
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2015; 43(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 25727725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Risks and artifacts in MRT (1.5 tesla) caused by metallic foreign bodies. Studies on phantoms and 60 patients].
    Maas R; Kooijman H; Heller M; Langkowski HJ; Grabbe E; Bücheler E
    Rofo; 1987 Oct; 147(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 2825256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of magnetic resonance safety of veterinary radiofrequency identification devices at 1 T.
    Baker MA; MacDonald I
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 21388467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of pharyngeal penetration injuries in dogs.
    Dobromylskyj MJ; Dennis R; Ladlow JF; Adams VJ
    J Small Anim Pract; 2008 Feb; 49(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 17850277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Managing postoperative artifacts on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Buckwalter KA; Lin C; Ford JM
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2011 Sep; 15(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 21928156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Injuries associated with MR imaging: survey of safety records and methods used to screen patients for metallic foreign bodies before imaging.
    Boutin RD; Briggs JE; Williamson MR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 8273663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing imaging techniques in the postoperative patient.
    Buckwalter KA
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2007 Sep; 11(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 18260036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
    Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT.
    Lee MJ; Kim S; Lee SA; Song HT; Huh YM; Kim DH; Han SH; Suh JS
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):791-803. PubMed ID: 17495293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative susceptibility artifact during magnetic resonance imaging of the vertebral column in two dogs and a cat.
    Freer SR; Scrivani PV
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 18251291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metal artifact reduction: standard and advanced magnetic resonance and computed tomography techniques.
    Gupta A; Subhas N; Primak AN; Nittka M; Liu K
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2015 May; 53(3):531-47. PubMed ID: 25953288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Metal abrasion as an imaging artefact in nuclear spin tomography].
    Weyrich G; Sigmund G; Schlickewei W; Vinée P
    Radiologe; 1993 Jun; 33(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 8332733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postimplantation MRI with cylindric and cubic intervertebral test implants: evaluation of implant shape, material, and volume in MRI artifacting--an in vitro study.
    Ernstberger T; Heidrich G; Buchhorn G
    Spine J; 2007; 7(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 17482121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR imaging in patients with metallic implants.
    Laakman RW; Kaufman B; Han JS; Nelson AD; Clampitt M; O'Block AM; Haaga JR; Alfidi RJ
    Radiology; 1985 Dec; 157(3):711-4. PubMed ID: 4059558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metallic artifact in MRI after removal of orthopedic implants.
    Bagheri MH; Hosseini MM; Emami MJ; Foroughi AA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):584-90. PubMed ID: 21146947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects.
    Costa AL; Appenzeller S; Yasuda CL; Pereira FR; Zanardi VA; Cendes F
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Jun; 14(6):E278-82. PubMed ID: 19300375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metallic foreign bodies in the orbits of patients undergoing MR imaging: prevalence and value of radiography and CT before MR.
    Williamson MR; Espinosa MC; Boutin RD; Orrison WW; Hart BL; Kelsey CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):981-3. PubMed ID: 8141030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of surgical implants on high-field magnetic resonance images of the normal canine stifle.
    David FH; Grierson J; Lamb CR
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 22372640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.