BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21382122)

  • 21. Metallic ballistic fragments: MR imaging safety and artifacts.
    Teitelbaum GP; Yee CA; Van Horn DD; Kim HS; Colletti PM
    Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):855-9. PubMed ID: 2343136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. MR susceptibility artifact due to occupational cause: an unusual case.
    Savranlar A; Vurdem ÜE; İnci MF; Turasan A
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 30(1):148-50. PubMed ID: 22055853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts.
    Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radio frequency versus susceptibility effects of small conductive implants--a systematic MRI study on aneurysm clips at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Lauer UA; Graf H; Berger A; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 15919602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Influence of sequence type on the extent of the susceptibility artifact in MRI--a shoulder specimen study after suture anchor repair].
    Herold T; Caro WC; Heers G; Perlick L; Grifka J; Feuerbach S; Nitz W; Lenhart M
    Rofo; 2004 Sep; 176(9):1296-301. PubMed ID: 15346265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters.
    Olsrud J; Lätt J; Brockstedt S; Romner B; Björkman-Burtscher IM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 16104008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Imaging characteristics of intraocular foreign bodies: a comparative study of plain film X-ray, computed tomography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Modjtahedi BS; Rong A; Bobinski M; McGahan J; Morse LS
    Retina; 2015 Jan; 35(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 25090044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Orthopedic spinal and hip prostheses: effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts during MR arteriography and venography of abdomen and pelvis.
    Fidelman NA; Wilson MW; Bloom AI; Kerlan RK; LaBerge JM; Gordon RL
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):894-9. PubMed ID: 16926332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Rivet-like titanium clamps for refixation of bone covers after craniotomy--radiologic identification, safety and image quality in CT and MR studies].
    Lerch KD; Morgenstern F; Lau KT; Hoffmann G
    Rofo; 1998 Dec; 169(6):601-4. PubMed ID: 9930212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patient screening prior to MR imaging: a practical approach synthesized from protocols at 15 U. S. medical centers.
    Elster AD; Link KM; Carr JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 8273665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. MRI of hip prostheses using single-point methods: in vitro studies towards the artifact-free imaging of individuals with metal implants.
    Ramos-Cabrer P; van Duynhoven JP; Van der Toorn A; Nicolay K
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Oct; 22(8):1097-103. PubMed ID: 15527996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of acute wooden foreign bodies in the canine manus.
    Ober CP; Jones JC; Larson MM; Lanz OI; Werre SR
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(5):411-8. PubMed ID: 18833946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Metal artifact reduction in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Harris CA; White LM
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2006 Jul; 37(3):349-59, vi. PubMed ID: 16846766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Tolerance of magnetic resonance imaging in children and adolescents performed in a 1.5 Tesla MR scanner with an open design].
    Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Radkow T; Alibek S; Holter W; Bautz WA; Staatz G
    Rofo; 2007 Aug; 179(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 17577870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
    White LM; Buckwalter KA
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2002 Mar; 6(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 11917267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Intracranial artifact un magnetic resonance caused by embolization of microscopic metallic fragment].
    Gorriño O; Oleaga L; de la Fuente R; García Bolado A; Grande D
    Neurologia; 2004 Dec; 19(10):766-8. PubMed ID: 15568175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cranial bone flap fixation clamps: compatibility at MR imaging.
    Shellock FG; Shellock VJ
    Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):822-5. PubMed ID: 9609911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improvement of the MR imaging behavior of vascular implants.
    Immel E; Melzer A
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2006; 15(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 16754191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valves in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of potential hazards.
    Pruefer D; Kalden P; Schreiber W; Dahm M; Buerke M; Thelen M; Oelert H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 11380110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Artifacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging.
    Singh DR; Chin MS; Peh WC
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2014 Feb; 18(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 24515878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.