172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21382181)
1. Laboratory-based ROTEM(®) analysis: implementing pneumatic tube transport and real-time graphic transmission.
Colucci G; Giabbani E; Barizzi G; Urwyler N; Alberio L
Int J Lab Hematol; 2011 Aug; 33(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 21382181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of acceleration forces during transport through a pneumatic tube system on ROTEM® analysis.
Amann G; Zehntner C; Marti F; Colucci G
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Mar; 50(8):1335-42. PubMed ID: 22868797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of laboratory coagulation tests and clotting factor levels on Rotation Thromboelastometry (ROTEM(R)) during major surgery with hemorrhage.
Theusinger OM; Schröder CM; Eismon J; Emmert MY; Seifert B; Spahn DR; Baulig W
Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 23780419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alterations in rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) parameters: point-of-care testing vs analysis after pneumatic tube system transport.
Martin J; Schuster T; Moessmer G; Kochs EF; Wagner KJ
Br J Anaesth; 2012 Oct; 109(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 22767647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample transport by pneumatic tube system alters results of multiple electrode aggregometry but not rotational thromboelastometry.
Glas M; Mauer D; Kassas H; Volk T; Kreuer S
Platelets; 2013; 24(6):454-61. PubMed ID: 22931353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thromboelastometric (ROTEM) findings in patients suffering from isolated severe traumatic brain injury.
Schöchl H; Solomon C; Traintinger S; Nienaber U; Tacacs-Tolnai A; Windhofer C; Bahrami S; Voelckel W
J Neurotrauma; 2011 Oct; 28(10):2033-41. PubMed ID: 21942848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-analytical effects of pneumatic tube transport on impedance platelet aggregometry.
Bolliger D; Seeberger MD; Tanaka KA; Dell-Kuster S; Gregor M; Zenklusen U; Grapow M; Tsakiris DA; Filipovic M
Platelets; 2009 Nov; 20(7):458-65. PubMed ID: 19852683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of interim ROTEM(®) values of clot strength, A5 and A10, in predicting final assessment of coagulation status in severely injured battle patients.
Woolley T; Midwinter M; Spencer P; Watts S; Doran C; Kirkman E
Injury; 2013 May; 44(5):593-9. PubMed ID: 22487164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of pneumatic tube system transport on ROTEM analysis and contact activation assessed by thrombin generation test.
Lancé MD; Kuiper GJ; Sloep M; Spronk HM; van Oerle R; ten Cate H; Marcus MA; Henskens YM
Thromb Res; 2012 Sep; 130(3):e147-50. PubMed ID: 22633532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pre-analytical effects of pneumatic tube system transport on routine haematology and coagulation tests, global coagulation assays and platelet function assays.
Le Quellec S; Paris M; Nougier C; Sobas F; Rugeri L; Girard S; Bordet JC; Négrier C; Dargaud Y
Thromb Res; 2017 May; 153():7-13. PubMed ID: 28292729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of pneumatic tube transport on whole blood coagulation and platelet function assays.
Nissen PH; Wulff DE; Tørring N; Hvas AM
Platelets; 2018 Jun; 29(4):421-424. PubMed ID: 29442531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Similarities in thromboelastometric (ROTEM®) findings between humans and baboons.
Schöchl H; Solomon C; Laux V; Heitmeier S; Bahrami S; Redl H
Thromb Res; 2012 Sep; 130(3):e107-12. PubMed ID: 22482831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters in patients with multiple myeloma at diagnosis.
Treliński J; Misiewicz M; Robak M; Smolewski P; Chojnowski K
Thromb Res; 2014 Apr; 133(4):667-70. PubMed ID: 24451990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrarater and interrater variability of point of care coagulation testing using the ROTEM delta.
Mauch J; Spielmann N; Hartnack S; Madjdpour C; Kutter AP; Bettschart-Wolfensberger R; Weiss M; Haas T
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2011 Dec; 22(8):662-6. PubMed ID: 21822125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of coagulation in the obstetric population using ROTEM® thromboelastometry.
Armstrong S; Fernando R; Ashpole K; Simons R; Columb M
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2011 Oct; 20(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 21835606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Manageability and potential for haemostasis monitoring by near-patient modified thromboelastometer (Rotem) in intensive care unit].
Savry C; Quinio P; Lefèvre F; Schmitt F
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2005 Jun; 24(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 15922540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In-vitro comparison of free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in trauma patients upon hospital admission.
Sølbeck S; Windeløv NA; Bæk NH; Nielsen JD; Ostrowski SR; Johansson PI
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2012 Dec; 23(8):688-92. PubMed ID: 23128358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal changes in ROTEM®-measured coagulability of citrated blood samples from coagulopathic trauma patients.
Jansen JO; Luke D; Davies E; Spencer P; Kirkman E; Midwinter MJ
Injury; 2013 Jan; 44(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 22204772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coagulation assessment by rotation thrombelastometry in normal pregnancy.
Huissoud C; Carrabin N; Benchaib M; Fontaine O; Levrat A; Massignon D; Touzet S; Rudigoz RC; Berland M
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Apr; 101(4):755-61. PubMed ID: 19350122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of thrombelastometry (ROTEM®): point-of-care versus hospital laboratory performance.
Haas T; Spielmann N; Mauch J; Speer O; Schmugge M; Weiss M
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2012 Jul; 72(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 22724625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
