335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21383297)
1. At what cost does a potential survival advantage of bevacizumab make sense for the primary treatment of ovarian cancer? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cohn DE; Kim KH; Resnick KE; O'Malley DM; Straughn JM
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 29(10):1247-51. PubMed ID: 21383297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Big costs for little gain in ovarian cancer.
Hensley ML
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 29(10):1230-2. PubMed ID: 21383287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A cost-utility analysis of NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol 218: incorporating prospectively collected quality-of-life scores in an economic model of treatment of ovarian cancer.
Cohn DE; Barnett JC; Wenzel L; Monk BJ; Burger RA; Straughn JM; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Feb; 136(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 25449568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of combination versus sequential docetaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.
Havrilesky LJ; Pokrzywinski R; Revicki D; Higgins RV; Nycum LR; Kohler MF; Berchuck A; Myers ER; Secord AA
Cancer; 2012 Jan; 118(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 21598242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An economic analysis of dose dense weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus every-3-week paclitaxel plus carboplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.
Dalton HJ; Yu X; Hu L; Kapp DS; Benjamin I; Monk BJ; Chan JK
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 22055763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consolidation paclitaxel is more cost-effective than bevacizumab following upfront treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Lesnock JL; Farris C; Krivak TC; Smith KJ; Markman M
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):473-8. PubMed ID: 21665250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Smith HJ; Walters Haygood CL; Arend RC; Leath CA; Straughn JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Oct; 139(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 26303225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cost-benefit analysis of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Montero AJ; Avancha K; Glück S; Lopes G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(2):747-51. PubMed ID: 22200867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost effectiveness of alternative strategies for incorporating bevacizumab into the primary treatment of ovarian cancer.
Barnett JC; Alvarez Secord A; Cohn DE; Leath CA; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
Cancer; 2013 Oct; 119(20):3653-61. PubMed ID: 23921967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel versus intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Bristow RE; Santillan A; Salani R; Diaz-Montes TP; Giuntoli RL; Meisner BC; Armstrong DK; Frick KD
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Sep; 106(3):476-81. PubMed ID: 17688927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. NICE guidance on bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin for the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.
Dyer M; Richardson J; Robertson J; Adam J
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jul; 14(8):689-90. PubMed ID: 23706983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab to first line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Mehta DA; Hay JW
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):677-83. PubMed ID: 24463160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bevacizumab and ovarian cancer.
Sato S; Itamochi H
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 22123222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adding bevacizumab to single agent chemotherapy for the treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: A cost effectiveness analysis of the AURELIA trial.
Wysham WZ; Schaffer EM; Coles T; Roque DR; Wheeler SB; Kim KH
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 May; 145(2):340-345. PubMed ID: 28291545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A trial-based assessment of the cost-utility of bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Goulart B; Ramsey S
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):836-45. PubMed ID: 21914503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bevacizumab in treatment of high-risk ovarian cancer--a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Chan JK; Herzog TJ; Hu L; Monk BJ; Kiet T; Blansit K; Kapp DS; Yu X
Oncologist; 2014 May; 19(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 24721817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes for elderly, advanced-stage non small-cell lung cancer patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel: analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599.
Ramalingam SS; Dahlberg SE; Langer CJ; Gray R; Belani CP; Brahmer JR; Sandler AB; Schiller JH; Johnson DH;
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 18165641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of dose-dense versus standard intravenous chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: An economic analysis of results from the Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 262 randomized controlled trial.
Seagle BL; Shahabi S
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 145(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 28196674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-utility analysis of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Ortega A; Dranitsaris G; Sturgeon J; Sutherland H; Oza A
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Sep; 66(3):454-63. PubMed ID: 9299261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
