274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21384424)
1. On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI.
Sourbron SP; Buckley DL
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Sep; 66(3):735-45. PubMed ID: 21384424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended graphical model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Chen H; Li F; Zhao X; Yuan C; Rutt B; Kerwin WS
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Sep; 66(3):868-78. PubMed ID: 21394770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of Interstitial Fractional Volume Quantification by Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Porcine Skeletal Muscles.
Hindel S; Söhner A; Maa M; Sauerwein W; Baba HA; Kramer M; Lüdemann L
Invest Radiol; 2017 Jan; 52(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 27482651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix.
Donaldson SB; West CM; Davidson SE; Carrington BM; Hutchison G; Jones AP; Sourbron SP; Buckley DL
Magn Reson Med; 2010 Mar; 63(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 20187179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data in primary brain tumours: a comparison of Tofts and shutter speed models.
Inglese M; Ordidge KL; Honeyfield L; Barwick TD; Aboagye EO; Waldman AD; Grech-Sollars M
Neuroradiology; 2019 Dec; 61(12):1375-1386. PubMed ID: 31392385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust and efficient pharmacokinetic parameter non-linear least squares estimation for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the prostate.
Kargar S; Borisch EA; Froemming AT; Kawashima A; Mynderse LA; Stinson EG; Trzasko JD; Riederer SJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 48():50-61. PubMed ID: 29278764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. T2*-correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI from double-echo acquisitions.
Kleppestø M; Larsson C; Groote I; Salo R; Vardal J; Courivaud F; Bjørnerud A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 24123598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Kallehauge JF; Tanderup K; Duan C; Haack S; Pedersen EM; Lindegaard JC; Fokdal LU; Mohamed SM; Nielsen T
Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1064-72. PubMed ID: 25034348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling DCE-MRI at low temporal resolution: a case study on rheumatoid arthritis.
Ledsam JR; Hodgson R; Moots RJ; Sourbron SP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Dec; 38(6):1554-63. PubMed ID: 23857776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Cheng HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 18777534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporating contrast agent diffusion into the analysis of DCE-MRI data.
Pellerin M; Yankeelov TE; Lepage M
Magn Reson Med; 2007 Dec; 58(6):1124-34. PubMed ID: 17969007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of Blood Volume Fraction Quantification with 3D Gradient Echo Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Porcine Skeletal Muscle.
Hindel S; Söhner A; Maaß M; Sauerwein W; Möllmann D; Baba HA; Kramer M; Lüdemann L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170841. PubMed ID: 28141810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are complex DCE-MRI models supported by clinical data?
Duan C; Kallehauge JF; Bretthorst GL; Tanderup K; Ackerman JJ; Garbow JR
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1329-1339. PubMed ID: 26946317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in mice: an investigation of model parameter uncertainties.
Rukat T; Walker-Samuel S; Reinsberg SA
Magn Reson Med; 2015 May; 73(5):1979-87. PubMed ID: 25052296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of temporal sampling on quantitative pharmacokinetic and three-time-point analysis of breast DCE-MRI.
Fluckiger JU; Schabel MC; Dibella EV
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Sep; 30(7):934-43. PubMed ID: 22513074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal resolution and SNR requirements for accurate DCE-MRI data analysis using the AATH model.
Kershaw LE; Cheng HL
Magn Reson Med; 2010 Dec; 64(6):1772-80. PubMed ID: 20715059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: model selection, reproducibility, and validation.
Gaens ME; Backes WH; Rozel S; Lipperts M; Sanders SN; Jaspers K; Cleutjens JP; Sluimer JC; Heeneman S; Daemen MJ; Welten RJ; Daemen JW; Wildberger JE; Kwee RM; Kooi ME
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):271-9. PubMed ID: 23151823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging of prostate cancer.
Korporaal JG; van Vulpen M; van den Berg CA; van der Heide UA
Invest Radiol; 2012 Jan; 47(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 21610505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
