104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21384770)
1. Why is HIV ravaging D.C.?
McEnery R
IAVI Rep; 2010; 14(6):10-3. PubMed ID: 21384770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. CDC surveillance report notes slowdown in new HIV/AIDS rates.
AIDS Policy Law; 2002 Mar; 17(5):8. PubMed ID: 11924215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The family of HIV seroprevalence surveys: objectives, methods, and uses of sentinel surveillance for HIV in the United States.
Pappaioanou M; Dondero TJ; Petersen LR; Onorato IM; Sanchez CD; Curran JW
Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 2157233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Infection. HIV/AIDS rate in D.C. hits 3 percent, now on par with areas of Africa.
AIDS Policy Law; 2009 Apr; 24(5):1, 4. PubMed ID: 19434944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HIV vaccines in the context of a broader prevention agenda--views from urban U.S. projects: Washington, D.C. studies among adolescents.
D'Angelo LJ
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses; 1994; 10 Suppl 2():S7. PubMed ID: 7865337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Poor man's burden. Why are HIV rates so distressingly high in the southern U.S.?
Wapner J
Sci Am; 2011 Jul; 305(1):30, 32. PubMed ID: 21717954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Study identifies traits of effective needle exchange programs.
AIDS Policy Law; 2004 Dec; 20(1):1, 4. PubMed ID: 15651103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. CDC gives communities prevention strategies. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
AIDS Alert; 1999 Jun; 14(6):66. PubMed ID: 11366409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. HIV experts discuss whether U.S. can handle influx of new HIV cases. Opt-out testing likely will cause deluge.
AIDS Alert; 2007 Jan; 22(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17722338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. HIV infection in childbearing women.
AORN J; 1991 Aug; 54(2):287. PubMed ID: 1656874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Needle exchanges do not boost drug use, study says. IDU remains major HIV risk factor.
AIDS Alert; 2003 Sep; 18(9):112, 114. PubMed ID: 14686305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Priorities in HIV prevention.
Mokotoff ED
Science; 2001 Jan; 291(5501):45-6. PubMed ID: 11192005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. D.C. to track HIV cases by code, rather than name.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Sep; 14(16):10. PubMed ID: 11366898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New data from the CDC confirm HIV is on the rise.
AIDS Alert; 2004 Feb; 19(2):13, 15-7. PubMed ID: 15011624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is enough done to track HIV infections?
RN; 1992 May; 55(5):15-6. PubMed ID: 1317606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost effectiveness of SEPs.
Makulowich GS
AIDS Patient Care STDS; 1998 Feb; 12(2):151-2. PubMed ID: 11361923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ban on needle swaps.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Oct; 14(18):12. PubMed ID: 11367025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CDC wants all States to add HIV to current AIDS surveillance programs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
AIDS Alert; 1999 Feb; 14(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 11366171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Millions for prevention could save billions.
AIDS Alert; 2003 Aug; 18(8):96-7. PubMed ID: 12921056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevention. Needle-exchange programs effective in New York City.
Jarlais DD
AIDS Policy Law; 2001 Aug; 16(16):6. PubMed ID: 11548543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
