170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21386440)
1. Mechanosensitivity of astrocytes on optimized polyacrylamide gels analyzed by quantitative morphometry.
Moshayedi P; Costa Lda F; Christ A; Lacour SP; Fawcett J; Guck J; Franze K
J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 May; 22(19):194114. PubMed ID: 21386440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Theory of the mechanical response of focal adhesions to shear flow.
Biton YY; Safran SA
J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 May; 22(19):194111. PubMed ID: 21386437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Traction forces exerted by epithelial cell sheets.
Saez A; Anon E; Ghibaudo M; du Roure O; Di Meglio JM; Hersen P; Silberzan P; Buguin A; Ladoux B
J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 May; 22(19):194119. PubMed ID: 21386442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pericyte actomyosin-mediated contraction at the cell-material interface can modulate the microvascular niche.
Lee S; Zeiger A; Maloney JM; Kotecki M; Van Vliet KJ; Herman IM
J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 May; 22(19):194115. PubMed ID: 21386441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanics of single chondrocytes under direct shear.
Ofek G; Dowling EP; Raphael RM; McGarry JP; Athanasiou KA
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2010 Apr; 9(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19644718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling cytoskeletal flow over adhesion sites: competition between stochastic bond dynamics and intracellular relaxation.
Sabass B; Schwarz US
J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 May; 22(19):194112. PubMed ID: 21386438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model for how retrograde actin flow regulates adhesion traction stresses.
Li Y; Bhimalapuram P; Dinner AR
J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 May; 22(19):194113. PubMed ID: 21386439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion.
Peyton SR; Putnam AJ
J Cell Physiol; 2005 Jul; 204(1):198-209. PubMed ID: 15669099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Crosstalk between focal adhesions and material mechanical properties governs cell mechanics and functions.
Fusco S; Panzetta V; Embrione V; Netti PA
Acta Biomater; 2015 Sep; 23():63-71. PubMed ID: 26004223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels.
Buxboim A; Rajagopal K; Brown AE; Discher DE
J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 May; 22(19):194116. PubMed ID: 20454525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Theoretical concepts and models of cellular mechanosensing.
De R; Zemel A; Safran SA
Methods Cell Biol; 2010; 98():143-75. PubMed ID: 20816234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures.
Georges PC; Miller WJ; Meaney DF; Sawyer ES; Janmey PA
Biophys J; 2006 Apr; 90(8):3012-8. PubMed ID: 16461391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neutrophil adhesion and chemotaxis depend on substrate mechanics.
Jannat RA; Robbins GP; Ricart BG; Dembo M; Hammer DA
J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 May; 22(19):194117. PubMed ID: 20473350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining dynamic stretch and tunable stiffness to probe cell mechanobiology in vitro.
Throm Quinlan AM; Sierad LN; Capulli AK; Firstenberg LE; Billiar KL
PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23272. PubMed ID: 21858051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: the two-spring model.
Schwarz US; Erdmann T; Bischofs IB
Biosystems; 2006; 83(2-3):225-32. PubMed ID: 16236431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate mechanical and adhesive properties.
Féréol S; Fodil R; Labat B; Galiacy S; Laurent VM; Louis B; Isabey D; Planus E
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton; 2006 Jun; 63(6):321-40. PubMed ID: 16634082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element analysis of the effects of focal adhesion mechanical properties and substrate stiffness on cell migration.
Wong HC; Tang WC
J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(6):1046-50. PubMed ID: 21354575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neutrophils display biphasic relationship between migration and substrate stiffness.
Stroka KM; Aranda-Espinoza H
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton; 2009 Jun; 66(6):328-41. PubMed ID: 19373775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human corneal epithelial cell response to substrate stiffness.
Molladavoodi S; Kwon HJ; Medley J; Gorbet M
Acta Biomater; 2015 Jan; 11():324-32. PubMed ID: 25305512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High rate shear strain of three-dimensional neural cell cultures: a new in vitro traumatic brain injury model.
LaPlaca MC; Cullen DK; McLoughlin JJ; Cargill RS
J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1093-105. PubMed ID: 15797591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
