317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21387138)
41. Restoration of pull-out strength of the failed pedicle screw: biomechanical comparison of calcium sulfate vs polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
Güler UO; Derincek A; Hersekli MA; Ozalay M; Cinar BM; Acaroğlu E
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2014; 48(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 24747630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Stanley T; Faciane A; Miller SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers.
Bullmann V; Schmoelz W; Richter M; Grathwohl C; Schulte TL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E932-9. PubMed ID: 20508553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cement-augmented anterior screw fixation of Type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis.
Kohlhof H; Seidel U; Hoppe S; Keel MJ; Benneker LM
Spine J; 2013 Dec; 13(12):1858-63. PubMed ID: 23993037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation using novel cannulated cement insertion device.
Waits C; Burton D; McIff T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(14):E478-83. PubMed ID: 19525826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Augmentation of pedicle screw stability with calcium sulfate cement in osteoporotic sheep: biomechanical and screw-bone interfacial evaluation.
Liu D; Lei W; Wu ZX; Gao MX; Wan SY; Fu SC; Shi L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jun; 24(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 20844452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study.
Hasegawa T; Inufusa A; Imai Y; Mikawa Y; Lim TH; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 15863077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. In vivo study of pedicle screw augmentation using bioactive glass in osteoporosis sheep.
Li Y; Cheng H; Liu ZC; Wu JW; Yu L; Zang Y; He Q; Lei W; Wu ZX
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Jun; 26(4):E118-23. PubMed ID: 23079719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Single-segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures through the gap of paravertebral muscles].
Wang RY; Hua YJ; Chen JH; Chai JL; Shao LF; Zhao JF
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2012 Jan; 25(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 22489522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Biomechanical analysis of stiffness and fracture displacement after using PMMA-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation for sacrum fractures.
Höch A; Schimpf R; Hammer N; Schleifenbaum S; Werner M; Josten C; Böhme J
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Aug; 62(4):421-428. PubMed ID: 28306517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage.
Schmoelz W; Heinrichs CH; Schmidt S; Piñera AR; Tome-Bermejo F; Duart JM; Bauer M; Galovich LÁ
Eur Spine J; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2883-2890. PubMed ID: 28374330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Transpedicular vertebral body augmentation reinforced with pedicle screw fixation in fresh traumatic A2 and A3 lumbar fractures: comparison between two devices and two bone cements.
Korovessis P; Vardakastanis K; Repantis T; Vitsas V
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Jul; 24 Suppl 1():S183-91. PubMed ID: 23982115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Biomechanical comparison of 4 fixation techniques of sacral pedicle screw in osteoporotic condition.
Yu BS; Zhuang XM; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Li ZM; Lu WW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):404-9. PubMed ID: 20087222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Influence of two kinds of bone grafting methods on bone defect gap residual rates and compressive stiffness after reduction of thoracolumbar burst fracture].
Ao J; Xin Z; Chen F; Xin X; Liao W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 27(8):974-9. PubMed ID: 24171354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect and potential risks of using multilevel cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative disease.
Tang YC; Guo HZ; Guo DQ; Luo PJ; Li YX; Mo GY; Ma YH; Peng JC; Liang D; Zhang SC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):274. PubMed ID: 32345282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Expandable pedicle screw trajectory in cadaveric lumbar vertebra: an evaluation using microcomputed tomography.
Wan SY; Wu ZX; Zhang W; Liu D; Gao MX; Fu SC; Shi L; Lei W
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 20975595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Biomechanical Comparison of Pedicle Screw Augmented with Different Volumes of Polymethylmethacrylate in Osteoporotic and Severely Osteoporotic Synthetic Bone Blocks in Primary Implantation: An Experimental Study.
Liu D; Zhang XJ; Liao DF; Zhou JJ; Li ZQ; Zhang B; Wang CR; Lei W; Kang X; Zheng W
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9627504. PubMed ID: 26885525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Increased stability due to symmetric cement volume in augmented pedicle screws? A biomechanical study.
Weber M; Lenz M; Egenolf P; Prescher A; Walter S; Heck VJ; Eysel P; Scheyerer MJ
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2024 Jan; 112(1):e35339. PubMed ID: 37955803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A new technique of bone cement augmentation via the disc space for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.
Park CK; Park CK; Lee DC; Lee DG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 26360145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
