164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21388521)
1. Sequence optimization to reduce velocity offsets in cardiovascular magnetic resonance volume flow quantification--a multi-vendor study.
Rolf MP; Hofman MB; Gatehouse PD; Markenroth-Bloch K; Heymans MW; Ebbers T; Graves MJ; Totman JJ; Werner B; van Rossum AC; Kilner PJ; Heethaar RM
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Mar; 13(1):18. PubMed ID: 21388521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-vivo validation of interpolation-based phase offset correction in cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow quantification: a multi-vendor, multi-center study.
Hofman MBM; Rodenburg MJA; Markenroth Bloch K; Werner B; Westenberg JJM; Valsangiacomo Buechel ER; Nijveldt R; Spruijt OA; Kilner PJ; van Rossum AC; Gatehouse PD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 May; 21(1):30. PubMed ID: 31104632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical impact of phase offset errors and different correction methods in cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging: a multi-scanner study.
Minderhoud SCS; van der Velde N; Wentzel JJ; van der Geest RJ; Attrach M; Wielopolski PA; Budde RPJ; Helbing WA; Roos-Hesselink JW; Hirsch A
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Sep; 22(1):68. PubMed ID: 32938483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements.
Gatehouse PD; Rolf MP; Graves MJ; Hofman MB; Totman J; Werner B; Quest RA; Liu Y; von Spiczak J; Dieringer M; Firmin DN; van Rossum A; Lombardi M; Schwitter J; Schulz-Menger J; Kilner PJ
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 20074359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of protocol choice on phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance flow measurement in the ascending aorta: breath-hold and non-breath-hold.
Bolen MA; Setser RM; Gabriel RS; Renapurkar RD; Tandon Y; Lieber ML; Desai MY; Flamm SD
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 22527258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Method for calculating confidence intervals for phase contrast flow measurements.
Hansen MS; Olivieri LJ; O'Brien K; Cross RR; Inati SJ; Kellman P
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jun; 16(1):46. PubMed ID: 24962371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels.
Chernobelsky A; Shubayev O; Comeau CR; Wolff SD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 17578724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine learning derived segmentation of phase velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance for fully automated aortic flow quantification.
Bratt A; Kim J; Pollie M; Beecy AN; Tehrani NH; Codella N; Perez-Johnston R; Palumbo MC; Alakbarli J; Colizza W; Drexler IR; Azevedo CF; Kim RJ; Devereux RB; Weinsaft JW
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Jan; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 30612574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo and in vitro validation of aortic flow quantification by time-resolved three-dimensional velocity-encoded MRI.
Rengier F; Delles M; Unterhinninghofen R; Ley S; Müller-Eschner M; Partovi S; Geisbüsch P; Dillmann R; Kauczor HU; von Tengg-Kobligk H
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 28(8):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 22362096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of 4D flow CMR against simultaneous invasive hemodynamic measurements: a swine study.
Stam K; Chelu RG; van der Velde N; van Duin R; Wielopolski P; Nieman K; Merkus D; Hirsch A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1111-1118. PubMed ID: 30963352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability and reproducibility of various 4D Flow MRI postprocessing software programs in a multi-software and multi-vendor cross-over comparison study.
Oechtering TH; Nowak A; Sieren MM; Stroth AM; Kirschke N; Wegner F; Balks M; König IR; Jin N; Graessner J; Kooijman-Kurfuerst H; Hennemuth A; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2023 Mar; 25(1):22. PubMed ID: 36978131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multipoint 5D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - accelerated cardiac- and respiratory-motion resolved mapping of mean and turbulent velocities.
Walheim J; Dillinger H; Kozerke S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Jul; 21(1):42. PubMed ID: 31331353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic length measurements for pulse wave velocity calculation: manual 2D vs automated 3D centreline extraction.
van Engelen A; Silva Vieira M; Rafiq I; Cecelja M; Schneider T; de Bliek H; Figueroa CA; Hussain T; Botnar RM; Alastruey J
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):32. PubMed ID: 28270208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different methods for the estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Houriez-Gombaud-Saintonge S; Mousseaux E; Bargiotas I; De Cesare A; Dietenbeck T; Bouaou K; Redheuil A; Soulat G; Giron A; Gencer U; Craiem D; Messas E; Bollache E; Chenoune Y; Kachenoura N
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Dec; 21(1):75. PubMed ID: 31829235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Traveling Volunteers: A Multi-Vendor, Multi-Center Study on Reproducibility and Comparability of 4D Flow Derived Aortic Hemodynamics in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
Demir A; Wiesemann S; Erley J; Schmitter S; Trauzeddel RF; Pieske B; Hansmann J; Kelle S; Schulz-Menger J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jan; 55(1):211-222. PubMed ID: 34173297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bramwell-Hill modeling for local aortic pulse wave velocity estimation: a validation study with velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive pressure assessment.
Westenberg JJ; van Poelgeest EP; Steendijk P; Grotenhuis HB; Jukema JW; de Roos A
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 22230116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Baseline correction of phase-contrast images in congenital cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Holland BJ; Printz BF; Lai WW
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Mar; 12(1):11. PubMed ID: 20205725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis and correction of background velocity offsets in phase-contrast flow measurements using magnetic field monitoring.
Giese D; Haeberlin M; Barmet C; Pruessmann KP; Schaeffter T; Kozerke S
Magn Reson Med; 2012 May; 67(5):1294-302. PubMed ID: 21826731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic correction of background phase offset in 4D-flow of great vessels and of the heart in MRI using a third-order surface model.
Craiem D; Pascaner AF; Casciaro ME; Gencer U; Alcibar J; Soulat G; Mousseaux E
MAGMA; 2019 Dec; 32(6):629-642. PubMed ID: 31230182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Required temporal resolution for accurate thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity measurements by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with clinical standard applanation tonometry.
Dorniak K; Heiberg E; Hellmann M; Rawicz-Zegrzda D; Wesierska M; Galaska R; Sabisz A; Szurowska E; Dudziak M; Hedström E
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May; 16(1):110. PubMed ID: 27387199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
