162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21388959)
1. Critical roles of interactions among switch I-preceding residues and between switch II and its neighboring alpha-helix in conformational dynamics of the GTP-bound Ras family small GTPases.
Matsumoto K; Shima F; Muraoka S; Araki M; Hu L; Ijiri Y; Hirai R; Liao J; Yoshioka T; Kumasaka T; Yamamoto M; Tamura A; Kataoka T
J Biol Chem; 2011 Apr; 286(17):15403-12. PubMed ID: 21388959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structural basis for conformational dynamics of GTP-bound Ras protein.
Shima F; Ijiri Y; Muraoka S; Liao J; Ye M; Araki M; Matsumoto K; Yamamoto N; Sugimoto T; Yoshikawa Y; Kumasaka T; Yamamoto M; Tamura A; Kataoka T
J Biol Chem; 2010 Jul; 285(29):22696-705. PubMed ID: 20479006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crystal structure of M-Ras reveals a GTP-bound "off" state conformation of Ras family small GTPases.
Ye M; Shima F; Muraoka S; Liao J; Okamoto H; Yamamoto M; Tamura A; Yagi N; Ueki T; Kataoka T
J Biol Chem; 2005 Sep; 280(35):31267-75. PubMed ID: 15994326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oncogenic mutations Q61L and Q61H confer active form-like structural features to the inactive state (state 1) conformation of H-Ras protein.
Matsumoto S; Taniguchi-Tamura H; Araki M; Kawamura T; Miyamoto R; Tsuda C; Shima F; Kumasaka T; Okuno Y; Kataoka T
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2021 Aug; 565():85-90. PubMed ID: 34102474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Solution structure of the state 1 conformer of GTP-bound H-Ras protein and distinct dynamic properties between the state 1 and state 2 conformers.
Araki M; Shima F; Yoshikawa Y; Muraoka S; Ijiri Y; Nagahara Y; Shirono T; Kataoka T; Tamura A
J Biol Chem; 2011 Nov; 286(45):39644-53. PubMed ID: 21930707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crystal structures of the state 1 conformations of the GTP-bound H-Ras protein and its oncogenic G12V and Q61L mutants.
Muraoka S; Shima F; Araki M; Inoue T; Yoshimoto A; Ijiri Y; Seki N; Tamura A; Kumasaka T; Yamamoto M; Kataoka T
FEBS Lett; 2012 Jun; 586(12):1715-8. PubMed ID: 22584058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structural basis for the unique biological function of small GTPase RHEB.
Yu Y; Li S; Xu X; Li Y; Guan K; Arnold E; Ding J
J Biol Chem; 2005 Apr; 280(17):17093-100. PubMed ID: 15728574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic properties of the Ras switch I region and its importance for binding to effectors.
Spoerner M; Herrmann C; Vetter IR; Kalbitzer HR; Wittinghofer A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Apr; 98(9):4944-9. PubMed ID: 11320243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. X-ray crystal structures reveal two activated states for RhoC.
Dias SM; Cerione RA
Biochemistry; 2007 Jun; 46(22):6547-58. PubMed ID: 17497936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular Mechanism for Conformational Dynamics of Ras·GTP Elucidated from In-Situ Structural Transition in Crystal.
Matsumoto S; Miyano N; Baba S; Liao J; Kawamura T; Tsuda C; Takeda A; Yamamoto M; Kumasaka T; Kataoka T; Shima F
Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25931. PubMed ID: 27180801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structural insight into the rearrangement of the switch I region in GTP-bound G12A K-Ras.
Xu S; Long BN; Boris GH; Chen A; Ni S; Kennedy MA
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Dec; 73(Pt 12):970-984. PubMed ID: 29199977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revisiting the structural flexibility of the complex p21(ras)-GTP: the catalytic conformation of the molecular switch II.
Soares TA; Miller JH; Straatsma TP
Proteins; 2001 Dec; 45(4):297-312. PubMed ID: 11746677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ras-p21 bound to GDP and GTP: differences in protein and ligand dynamics.
Mello LV; van Aalten DM; Findlay JB
Protein Eng; 1997 Apr; 10(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 9194162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Light on the structural communication in Ras GTPases.
Raimondi F; Felline A; Portella G; Orozco M; Fanelli F
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2013; 31(2):142-57. PubMed ID: 22849539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regional polysterism in the GTP-bound form of the human c-Ha-Ras protein.
Ito Y; Yamasaki K; Iwahara J; Terada T; Kamiya A; Shirouzu M; Muto Y; Kawai G; Yokoyama S; Laue ED; Wälchli M; Shibata T; Nishimura S; Miyazawa T
Biochemistry; 1997 Jul; 36(30):9109-19. PubMed ID: 9230043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conformational states of human rat sarcoma (Ras) protein complexed with its natural ligand GTP and their role for effector interaction and GTP hydrolysis.
Spoerner M; Hozsa C; Poetzl JA; Reiss K; Ganser P; Geyer M; Kalbitzer HR
J Biol Chem; 2010 Dec; 285(51):39768-78. PubMed ID: 20937837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the average structures, from molecular dynamics, of complexes of GTPase activating protein (GAP) with oncogenic and wild-type ras-p21: identification of potential effector domains.
Chen JM; Friedman FK; Brandt-Rauf PW; Pincus MR; Chie L
J Protein Chem; 2002 Jul; 21(5):349-59. PubMed ID: 12206509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The crystal structure of the small GTPase Rab11b reveals critical differences relative to the Rab11a isoform.
Scapin SM; Carneiro FR; Alves AC; Medrano FJ; Guimarães BG; Zanchin NI
J Struct Biol; 2006 Jun; 154(3):260-8. PubMed ID: 16545962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active and Inactive Cdc42 Differ in Their Insert Region Conformational Dynamics.
Haspel N; Jang H; Nussinov R
Biophys J; 2021 Jan; 120(2):306-318. PubMed ID: 33347888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.
Nakhaeizadeh H; Amin E; Nakhaei-Rad S; Dvorsky R; Ahmadian MR
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167145. PubMed ID: 27936046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
