BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21389000)

  • 1. Analysis of the sensitivity of absorbed light and incident light profile to various canopy architecture and stand conditions.
    Kim HS; Palmroth S; Thérézien M; Stenberg P; Oren R
    Tree Physiol; 2011 Jan; 31(1):30-47. PubMed ID: 21389000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in light-intercepting area and photosynthetic rate of sun and shade shoots of two Picea species in relation to the angle of incoming light.
    Ishii H; Hamada Y; Utsugi H
    Tree Physiol; 2012 Oct; 32(10):1227-36. PubMed ID: 23077118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Importance of needle age and shoot structure on canopy net photosynthesis of balsam fir (Abies balsamea): a spatially inexplicit modeling analysis.
    Bernier PY; Raulier F; Stenberg P; Ung CH
    Tree Physiol; 2001 Aug; 21(12-13):815-30. PubMed ID: 11498329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Convergence of leaf display and photosynthetic characteristics of understory Abies amabilis and Tsuga heterophylla in an old-growth forest in southwestern Washington State, USA.
    Ishii H; Yoshimura K; Mori A
    Tree Physiol; 2009 Aug; 29(8):989-98. PubMed ID: 19525494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Woody-to-total area ratio determination with a multispectral canopy imager.
    Zou J; Yan G; Zhu L; Zhang W
    Tree Physiol; 2009 Aug; 29(8):1069-80. PubMed ID: 19556235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shoot structure and growth along a vertical profile within a Populus-Tilia canopy.
    Kull O; Tulva I
    Tree Physiol; 2002 Nov; 22(15-16):1167-75. PubMed ID: 12414376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in foliar respiration and wood CO2 efflux rates among species and canopy layers in a wet tropical forest.
    Asao S; Bedoya-Arrieta R; Ryan MG
    Tree Physiol; 2015 Feb; 35(2):148-59. PubMed ID: 25597756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of kaolin application on light absorption and distribution, radiation use efficiency and photosynthesis of almond and walnut canopies.
    Rosati A; Metcalf SG; Buchner RP; Fulton AE; Lampinen BD
    Ann Bot; 2007 Feb; 99(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 17138580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related effects on leaf area/sapwood area relationships, canopy transpiration and carbon gain of Norway spruce stands (Picea abies) in the Fichtelgebirge, Germany.
    Köstner B; Falge E; Tenhunen JD
    Tree Physiol; 2002 Jun; 22(8):567-74. PubMed ID: 12045028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contributions of climate, leaf area index and leaf physiology to variation in gross primary production of six coniferous forests across Europe: a model-based analysis.
    Duursma RA; Kolari P; Perämäki M; Pulkkinen M; Mäkelä A; Nikinmaa E; Hari P; Aurela M; Berbigier P; Bernhofer CH; Grünwald T; Loustau D; Mölder M; Verbeeck H; Vesala T
    Tree Physiol; 2009 May; 29(5):621-39. PubMed ID: 19324698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The phenology of leaf quality and its within-canopy variation is essential for accurate modeling of photosynthesis in tropical evergreen forests.
    Wu J; Serbin SP; Xu X; Albert LP; Chen M; Meng R; Saleska SR; Rogers A
    Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Nov; 23(11):4814-4827. PubMed ID: 28418158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heterogeneity of competition at decameter scale: patches of high canopy leaf area in a shade-intolerant larch stand transpire less yet are more sensitive to drought.
    Xiong W; Oren R; Wang Y; Yu P; Liu H; Cao G; Xu L; Wang Y; Zuo H
    Tree Physiol; 2015 May; 35(5):470-84. PubMed ID: 25836360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural adjustments in resprouting trees drive differences in post-fire transpiration.
    Nolan RH; Mitchell PJ; Bradstock RA; Lane PN
    Tree Physiol; 2014 Feb; 34(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 24536069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seasonal evolution of diffusional limitations and photosynthetic capacity in olive under drought.
    Diaz-Espejo A; Nicolás E; Fernández JE
    Plant Cell Environ; 2007 Aug; 30(8):922-33. PubMed ID: 17617820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electron transport efficiency at opposite leaf sides: effect of vertical distribution of leaf angle, structure, chlorophyll content and species in a forest canopy.
    Mänd P; Hallik L; Peñuelas J; Kull O
    Tree Physiol; 2013 Feb; 33(2):202-10. PubMed ID: 23185067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shoot structure and photosynthetic efficiency along the light gradient in a Scots pine canopy.
    Stenberg P; Palmroth S; Bond BJ; Sprugel DG; Smolander H
    Tree Physiol; 2001 Aug; 21(12-13):805-14. PubMed ID: 11498328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constraints on light interception efficiency due to shoot architecture in broad-leaved Nothofagus species.
    Niinemets U; Cescatti A; Christian R
    Tree Physiol; 2004 Jun; 24(6):617-30. PubMed ID: 15059762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why does leaf nitrogen decline within tree canopies less rapidly than light? An explanation from optimization subject to a lower bound on leaf mass per area.
    Dewar RC; Tarvainen L; Parker K; Wallin G; McMurtrie RE
    Tree Physiol; 2012 May; 32(5):520-34. PubMed ID: 22619074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How vertical patterns in leaf traits shift seasonally and the implications for modeling canopy photosynthesis in a temperate deciduous forest.
    Coble AP; VanderWall B; Mau A; Cavaleri MA
    Tree Physiol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1077-91. PubMed ID: 27246164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Optical methods for in situ measuring leaf area index of forest canopy: a review].
    Zou J; Yan GJ
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2010 Nov; 21(11):2971-9. PubMed ID: 21361026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.