These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21389702)
21. Historical background of bone conduction hearing devices and bone conduction hearing aids. Mudry A; Tjellström A Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():1-9. PubMed ID: 21389699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bone-anchored devices in single-sided deafness. Stewart CM; Clark JH; Niparko JK Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():92-102. PubMed ID: 21389709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is complex signal processing for bone conduction hearing aids useful? Kompis M; Kurz A; Pfiffner F; Senn P; Arnold A; Caversaccio M Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S47-50. PubMed ID: 24869443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: initial results and experience. Centric A; Chennupati SK Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 May; 78(5):875-8. PubMed ID: 24612554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss. Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups. Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-week loading of the 4.5mm wide titanium implant in bone anchored hearing systems. Wazen JJ; Babu S; Daugherty J; Metrailer A Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 26954868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Partially implantable bone conduction hearing aids without a percutaneous abutment (Otomag): technique and preliminary clinical results. Siegert R Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():41-46. PubMed ID: 21389703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss. Marino R; Linton N; Eikelboom RH; Statham E; Rajan GP Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Audiometric Comparison Between the First Patients With the Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant and Matched Percutaneous Bone Anchored Hearing Device Users. Rigato C; Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Jansson KJ; Hol MK; Eeg-Olofsson M Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1381-7. PubMed ID: 27631828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The efficacy of unilateral bone-anchored hearing devices in Chinese Mandarin-speaking patients with bilateral aural atresia. Fan Y; Zhang Y; Wang P; Wang Z; Zhu X; Yang H; Chen X JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Apr; 140(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 24503772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing. Desmet JB; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Lambrechts P; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Blineder M; Flak S; Bachner A; Gstoettner W; Hamzavi JS Laryngoscope; 2014 Dec; 124(12):2802-6. PubMed ID: 25142577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital processing technology for bone-anchored hearing aids: randomised comparison of two devices in hearing aid users with mixed or conductive hearing loss. Hill-Feltham P; Roberts SA; Gladdis R J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Feb; 128(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 24524414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Strategies of active middle ear implants for hearing rehabilitation in congenital aural atresia. Verhaert N; Fuchsmann C; Tringali S; Lina-Granade G; Truy E Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 21436753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users. Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of discrimination ability in ipsilateral and contralateral ears with a unilateral bone-anchored hearing system. Celikgun B; Kalcioglu MT Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Aug; 96(8):297-310. PubMed ID: 28846784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An experimental objective method to determine maximum output and dynamic range of an active bone conduction implant: the Bonebridge. Mertens G; Desmet J; Snik AF; Van de Heyning P Otol Neurotol; 2014 Aug; 35(7):1126-30. PubMed ID: 24662632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]