These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21389857)

  • 1. Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise.
    Oba SI; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 21389857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory training in patients with unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral acoustic stimulation.
    Zhang T; Dorman MF; Fu QJ; Spahr AJ
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):e70-9. PubMed ID: 22622705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing.
    McDermott H; Henshall K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):380-9. PubMed ID: 20701835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.
    Skinner MW; Arndt PL; Staller SJ
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):2S-17S. PubMed ID: 11883765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of stimulus modality, task complexity, and cuing on working memory and the relationship with speech recognition in older cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Azuma T; Kolberg C; Pulling KR
    J Commun Disord; 2022; 95():106170. PubMed ID: 34839068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-Based Connected-Text Training of Speech-in-Noise Perception for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519843878. PubMed ID: 31010386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation.
    Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Oakley S; Gantz BJ; Noble W
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):352-9. PubMed ID: 18453885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners.
    Schumann A; Serman M; Gefeller O; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 25549690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Sequential Sentence Paradigm Using Revised PRESTO Sentence Lists.
    Plotkowski AR; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):647-60. PubMed ID: 27564442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.
    Vermiglio AJ; Herring CC; Heeke P; Post CE; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30461388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
    Liu YW; Tao DD; Chen B; Cheng X; Shu Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musical Rehabilitation in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With a Self-administered Software.
    Smith L; Bartel L; Joglekar S; Chen J
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):e262-e267. PubMed ID: 28806336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.