These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21391142)

  • 1. Non-testing approaches under REACH--help or hindrance? Perspectives from a practitioner within industry.
    Patlewicz G; Chen MW; Bellin CA
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2011 Mar; 22(1-2):67-88. PubMed ID: 21391142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation.
    Höfer T; Gerner I; Gundert-Remy U; Liebsch M; Schulte A; Spielmann H; Vogel R; Wettig K
    Arch Toxicol; 2004 Oct; 78(10):549-64. PubMed ID: 15170526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of the European centre for the validation of alternative methods (ECVAM) in the validation of (Q)SARs.
    Worth AP; Hartung T; Van Leeuwen CJ
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):345-58. PubMed ID: 15669694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods.
    Worth AP; Bassan A; De Bruijn J; Gallegos Saliner A; Netzeva T; Patlewicz G; Pavan M; Tsakovska I; Eisenreich S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(1-2):111-25. PubMed ID: 17365963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the number of EINECS compounds that can be covered by (Q)SAR models for acute toxicity.
    Zvinavashe E; Murk AJ; Rietjens IM
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Jan; 184(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 19041378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The prospects for using (Q)SARs in a changing political environment--high expectations and a key role for the European Commission's joint research centre.
    Worth AP; Van Leeuwen CJ; Hartung T
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):331-43. PubMed ID: 15669693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t(4)).
    Rovida C; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2009; 26(3):187-208. PubMed ID: 19907906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH--a summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():149-58. PubMed ID: 16555968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Integrated Assessment Scheme for assessing the adequacy of (eco)toxicological data under REACH.
    Hulzebos E; Gunnarsdottir S; Rila JP; Dang Z; Rorije E
    Toxicol Lett; 2010 Oct; 198(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 20633615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. REACH and reproductive and developmental toxicology: still questions.
    Scialli AR; Guikema AJ
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 22239083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH.
    Scialli AR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 18490093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the applicability of (Q)SARs for percutaneous penetration in regulatory risk assessment.
    Bouwman T; Cronin MT; Bessems JG; van de Sandt JJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 27(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 18684796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: challenges and opportunities.
    Costa DL
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):105-9. PubMed ID: 18486462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulatory use of (Q)SARs in toxicological hazard assessment strategies.
    Gerner I; Spielmann H; Hoefer T; Liebsch M; Herzler M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):359-66. PubMed ID: 15669695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating process safety with molecular modeling-based risk assessment of chemicals within the REACH regulatory framework: benefits and future challenges.
    Lewis A; Kazantzis N; Fishtik I; Wilcox J
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Apr; 142(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 16930827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introduction to the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():5-10. PubMed ID: 16555955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. REACH, non-testing approaches and the urgent need for a change in mind set.
    Schaafsma G; Kroese ED; Tielemans EL; Van de Sandt JJ; Van Leeuwen CJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 19061930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances.
    Simon-Hettich B; Rothfuss A; Steger-Hartmann T
    Toxicology; 2006 Jul; 224(1-2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16707203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
    Dent MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.