272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21391773)
1. Inter- and intra-observer variability in contouring of the prostate gland on planning computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography.
Choi HJ; Kim YS; Lee SH; Lee YS; Park G; Jung JH; Cho BC; Park SH; Ahn H; Kim CS; Yi SY; Ahn SD
Acta Oncol; 2011 May; 50(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 21391773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of CBCT-based target and normal structure delineation in prostate cancer radiotherapy: multi-observer and image multi-modality study.
Lütgendorf-Caucig C; Fotina I; Stock M; Pötter R; Goldner G; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Feb; 98(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 21176984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-observer variability of clinical target volume delineation for bladder cancer using CT and cone beam CT.
Foroudi F; Haworth A; Pangehel A; Wong J; Roxby P; Duchesne G; Williams S; Tai KH
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 19453535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate bed radiotherapy planning: An inter- and intra-observer variability study.
Barkati M; Simard D; Taussky D; Delouya G
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 26568515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of high dose volumetric CT to reduce inter-observer delineation variability and PTV margins for prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Alasti H; Cho YB; Catton C; Berlin A; Chung P; Bayley A; Vandermeer A; Kong V; Jaffray D
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Oct; 125(1):118-123. PubMed ID: 28859933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of inter-observer variability of bladder boundary delineation on cone-beam CT.
Nishioka K; Shimizu S; Kinoshita R; Inoue T; Onodera S; Yasuda K; Harada K; Nishikawa Y; Onimaru R; Shirato H
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jul; 8():185. PubMed ID: 23879876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning.
Fiorino C; Reni M; Bolognesi A; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 1998 Jun; 47(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 9681892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic prostate localization on cone-beam CT scans for high precision image-guided radiotherapy.
Smitsmans MH; de Bois J; Sonke JJ; Betgen A; Zijp LJ; Jaffray DA; Lebesque JV; van Herk M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):975-84. PubMed ID: 16253772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-observer variability of prostate delineation on cone beam computerised tomography images.
White EA; Brock KK; Jaffray DA; Catton CN
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Feb; 21(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 19058954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets: the influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability.
Altorjai G; Fotina I; Lütgendorf-Caucig C; Stock M; Pötter R; Georg D; Dieckmann K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):e265-72. PubMed ID: 21620581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tomography co-registration.
Parker CC; Damyanovich A; Haycocks T; Haider M; Bayley A; Catton CN
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Feb; 66(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 12648794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation.
Yang Y; Schreibmann E; Li T; Wang C; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):685-705. PubMed ID: 17228114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observer uncertainties of soft tissue-based patient positioning in IGRT.
Hirose TA; Arimura H; Fukunaga JI; Ohga S; Yoshitake T; Shioyama Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 31957964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of soft tissue organ boundary visualization on cone-beam computed tomographic imaging.
Weiss E; Wu J; Sleeman W; Bryant J; Mitra P; Myers M; Ivanova T; Mukhopadhyay N; Ramakrishnan V; Murphy M; Williamson J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(3):929-36. PubMed ID: 20542644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contouring variability of human- and deformable-generated contours in radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Gardner SJ; Wen N; Kim J; Liu C; Pradhan D; Aref I; Cattaneo R; Vance S; Movsas B; Chetty IJ; Elshaikh MA
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(11):4429-47. PubMed ID: 25988718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated contour propagation of the prostate from pCT to CBCT images via deep unsupervised learning.
Liang X; Bibault JE; Leroy T; Escande A; Zhao W; Chen Y; Buyyounouski MK; Hancock SL; Bagshaw H; Xing L
Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1764-1770. PubMed ID: 33544390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone beam computed tomography guided treatment delivery and planning verification for magnetic resonance imaging only radiotherapy of the brain.
Edmund JM; Andreasen D; Mahmood F; Van Leemput K
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1496-500. PubMed ID: 26198652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam computed tomography-based dose calculation with deformable image registration using Hounsfield unit modifications.
Onozato Y; Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Arai K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Kishi K; Umezawa R; Matsushita H; Jingu K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jun; 89(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 24685445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Changes in target volumes definition by using MRI for prostate bed radiotherapy planning--preliminary results].
Sefrová J; Paluska ; Odrázka K; Belobradek Z; Hoffmann P; Prosvic P; Brod'ák M; Louda M; Macingová Z; Vosmik M
Klin Onkol; 2010; 23(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 20806824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A general methodology for three-dimensional analysis of variation in target volume delineation.
Remeijer P; Rasch C; Lebesque JV; van Herk M
Med Phys; 1999 Jun; 26(6):931-40. PubMed ID: 10436894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
