BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21392017)

  • 1. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
    Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
    Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone.
    Alegre A; Tomás JF; Martínez-Chamorro C; Gil-Fernández JJ; Fernández-Villalta MJ; Arranz R; Díaz MA; Granda A; Bernardo MR; Escudero A; López-Lorenzo JL; Fernández-Rañada JM
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Aug; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9257889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autografting with low-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
    Bellido M; Sureda A; Martino R; Madoz P; García J; Brunet S
    Haematologica; 1998 May; 83(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 9658727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide, sequential granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, and scheduled commencement of leukapheresis in 225 patients undergoing autologous transplantation.
    Bashey A; Donohue M; Liu L; Medina B; Corringham S; Ihasz A; Carrier E; Castro JE; Holman PR; Xu R; Law P; Ball ED; Lane TA
    Transfusion; 2007 Nov; 47(11):2153-60. PubMed ID: 17958545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
    Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies.
    Hamadani M; Kochuparambil ST; Osman S; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Bunner P; Watkins K; Morrison D; Speir E; Deremer D; Kota V; Jillella A; Craig M; Awan F
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22248715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recombinant human granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) administered following cytotoxic chemotherapy have a similar ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells.
    Hohaus S; Martin H; Wassmann B; Egerer G; Haus U; Färber L; Burger KJ; Goldschmidt H; Hoelzer D; Haas R
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Oct; 22(7):625-30. PubMed ID: 9818688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized trial comparing the combination of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of dendritic cell subsets in hematopoietic progenitor cell products.
    Lonial S; Hicks M; Rosenthal H; Langston A; Redei I; Torre C; Duenzl M; Feinstein B; Cherry J; Waller EK
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Dec; 10(12):848-57. PubMed ID: 15570253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduced risk of acute GVHD following mobilization of HLA-identical sibling donors with GM-CSF alone.
    Devine SM; Brown RA; Mathews V; Trinkaus K; Khoury H; Adkins D; Vij R; Sempek D; Graubert T; Tomasson M; Goodnough LT; DiPersio JF
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2005 Sep; 36(6):531-8. PubMed ID: 16025152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone and engraftment kinetics following autologous transplantation in children and adolescents with solid tumor.
    Watanabe H; Watanabe T; Suzuya H; Wakata Y; Kaneko M; Onishi T; Okamoto Y; Abe T; Kawano Y; Kagami S; Takaue Y
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(7):661-8. PubMed ID: 16489358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CD34+ cells mobilized by cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are functionally different from CD34+ cells mobilized by G-CSF.
    Cesana C; Carlo-Stella C; Regazzi E; Garau D; Sammarelli G; Caramatti C; Tabilio A; Mangoni L; Rizzoli V
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Mar; 21(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 9543059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GM-CSF versus G-CSF: engraftment characteristics, resource utilization, and cost following autologous PBSC transplantation.
    Zumberg MS; Leather HL; Nejame C; Meyer C; Wingard JR
    Cytotherapy; 2002; 4(6):531-8. PubMed ID: 12568989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors from normal donors using the combination of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor results in fewer plasmacytoid dendritic cells in the graft and enhanced donor T cell engraftment with Th1 polarization: results from a randomized clinical trial.
    Lonial S; Akhtari M; Kaufman J; Torre C; Lechowicz MJ; Flowers C; Sinha R; Khoury HJ; Langston AA; Waller EK
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2013 Mar; 19(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 23201472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of engraftment after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: CD34, colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage, or both?
    Jansen EM; Hanks SG; Terry C; Akard LP; Thompson JM; Dugan MJ; Jansen J
    Transfusion; 2007 May; 47(5):817-23. PubMed ID: 17465946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large-scale expansion and transplantation of CD34(+) hematopoietic cells: in vitro and in vivo confirmation of neutropenia abrogation related to the expansion process without impairment of the long-term engraftment capacity.
    Boiron JM; Dazey B; Cailliot C; Launay B; Attal M; Mazurier F; McNiece IK; Ivanovic Z; Caraux J; Marit G; Reiffers J
    Transfusion; 2006 Nov; 46(11):1934-42. PubMed ID: 17076849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing high-dose ifosfamide + GM-CSF vs high-dose cyclophosphamide + GM-CSF for blood progenitor cell mobilization.
    Vela-Ojeda J; Tripp-Villanueva F; Montiel-Cervantes L; Sánchez-Cortés E; Ayala-Sánchez M; Guevara-Moreno ME; García-León LD; Rosas-Cabral A; Esparza MA; González-Llaven J
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Jun; 25(11):1141-6. PubMed ID: 10849526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The VAD chemotherapy regimen plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg is as effective and less toxic than high-dose cyclophosphamide plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for progenitor cell mobilization: results from a monocentric study of 82 patients.
    Lefrère F; Zohar S; Ghez D; Delarue R; Audat F; Suarez F; Hermine O; Damaj G; Maillard N; Ribeil JA; Azagury M; Misbahi R; Jondeau K; Cavazzana-Calvo M; Dal Cortivo L; Varet B
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(8):725-9. PubMed ID: 16518433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term cultures to evaluate engraftment potential of CD34+ cells from peripheral blood after mobilization by chemotherapy with and without GM-CSF.
    Benboubker L; Domenech J; Linassier C; Desbois I; Delain M; Lamagnere JP; Colombat P; Binet C
    Exp Hematol; 1995 Dec; 23(14):1568-73. PubMed ID: 8542948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CD34+ cell adhesion molecule profiles differ between patients mobilized with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor alone and chemotherapy followed by granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor.
    Ford CD; Greenwood J; Anderson J; Snow G; Petersen FB
    Transfusion; 2006 Feb; 46(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16441594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 117.