These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2139240)

  • 1. Extension-flexion radiographs for motion studies of the lumbar spine. A comparison of two methods.
    Putto E; Tallroth K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1990 Feb; 15(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 2139240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic mobility of the lumbar spine and its relation to clinical back motion.
    Korpi J; Poussa M; Heliövaara M
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1988; 20(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 2970111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress X-rays and the low back pain patient.
    Phillips RB; Howe JW; Bustin G; Mick TJ; Rosenfeld I; Mills T
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990; 13(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 2140121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A digitizing technique for the study of movement of intradiscal dye in response to flexion and extension of the lumbar spine.
    Schnebel BE; Simmons JW; Chowning J; Davidson R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1988 Mar; 13(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 2968665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Validity and reliability of Spinal Mouse to assess lumbar flexion].
    Guermazi M; Ghroubi S; Kassis M; Jaziri O; Keskes H; Kessomtini W; Ben Hammouda I; Elleuch MH
    Ann Readapt Med Phys; 2006 May; 49(4):172-7. PubMed ID: 16630669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
    Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significance of angular mismatch between vertebral endplate and prosthetic endplate in lumbar total disc replacement.
    Lee CS; Chung SS; Oh SK; You JW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 May; 24(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 20844454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of four types of support on the segmental mobility of the lumbosacral spine.
    Fidler MW; Plasmans CM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1983 Sep; 65(7):943-7. PubMed ID: 6224799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
    Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apportionment of lumbar L2-S1 rotation across individual motion segments during a dynamic lifting task.
    Aiyangar A; Zheng L; Anderst W; Zhang X
    J Biomech; 2015 Oct; 48(13):3709-15. PubMed ID: 26362687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motion characteristic of the normal lumbar spine in young adults: instantaneous axis of rotation and vertebral center motion analyses.
    Yoshioka T; Tsuji H; Hirano N; Sainoh S
    J Spinal Disord; 1990 Jun; 3(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 2134418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study.
    Ivanov AA; Kiapour A; Ebraheim NA; Goel V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E162-9. PubMed ID: 19247155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lumbar mobility in asymptomatic individuals.
    Tallroth K; Alaranta H; Soukka A
    J Spinal Disord; 1992 Dec; 5(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 1490047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting dynamic foraminal stenosis in the lumbar spine.
    Singh V; Montgomery SR; Aghdasi B; Inoue H; Wang JC; Daubs MD
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1080-7. PubMed ID: 23669126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apophyseal arthritis limits lumbar motion in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
    Simkin PA; Downey DJ; Kilcoyne RF
    Arthritis Rheum; 1988 Jun; 31(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 3382452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
    Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From the international space station to the clinic: how prolonged unloading may disrupt lumbar spine stability.
    Bailey JF; Miller SL; Khieu K; O'Neill CW; Healey RM; Coughlin DG; Sayson JV; Chang DG; Hargens AR; Lotz JC
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 28962911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lumbar spine and pelvic posture between standing and sitting: a radiologic investigation including reliability and repeatability of the lumbar lordosis measure.
    De Carvalho DE; Soave D; Ross K; Callaghan JP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2010 Jan; 33(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 20114100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine.
    Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quantitative study of the human lumbar spine mobility in sagittal plane.
    Diaconescu N; Klepp HJ; Drăgan G
    Morphol Embryol (Bucur); 1981; 27(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 6457983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.