BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21392668)

  • 1. Comparison of arch forms between Egyptian and North American white populations.
    Bayome M; Sameshima GT; Kim Y; Nojima K; Baek SH; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e245-52. PubMed ID: 21392668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of arch forms between Israeli and North American white populations.
    Gafni Y; Tzur-Gadassi L; Nojima K; McLaughlin RP; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 21392688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations.
    Kook YA; Nojima K; Moon HB; McLaughlin RP; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):680-6. PubMed ID: 15592215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American.
    Celebi AA; Keklik H; Tan E; Ucar FI
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 27275615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Pavlin D; Illes D; Slaj M
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):919-24. PubMed ID: 20578864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Jelusic D; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 22051488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of occlusal contacts among different groups of malocclusion using 3D digital models.
    Al-Rayes NZ; Hajeer MY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan; 15(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 24939264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparision of dental arch widths in different types of malocclusions.
    Basaran G; Hamamci N; Hamamci O
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e20-8. PubMed ID: 19641761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Sifakakis I; Makou M; Eliades T
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal Class I individuals presenting with different dental angle classifications.
    Akyalçin S; Doğan S; Dinçer B; Erdinc AM; Oncağ G
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):637-43. PubMed ID: 16808571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Uysal T; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shape variation and covariation of upper and lower dental arches of an orthodontic population.
    Papagiannis A; Halazonetis DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 25840587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental arch dimensions and tooth wear in two samples of children in the 1950s and 1990s.
    Camporesi M; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Defraia E
    Br Dent J; 2009 Dec; 207(12):E24. PubMed ID: 19876044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Gupta D; Miner RM; Arai K; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):10.e1-8; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 20620824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of arch form between Vietnamese and North American Caucasians using 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Trang VT; Park JH; Bayome M; Shastry S; Mellion A; Kook YA
    Anthropol Anz; 2015; 72(2):223-4. PubMed ID: 25806820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is arch form influenced by sagittal molar relationship or Bolton tooth-size discrepancy?
    Aldrees AM; Al-Shujaa AM; Alqahtani MA; Aljhani AS
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 15():70. PubMed ID: 26113007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion.
    Grippaudo C; Oliva B; Greco AL; Sferra S; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov; 14():43. PubMed ID: 24326093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.