157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21392686)
1. Evaluation of simulated external root resorptions with digital radiography and digital subtraction radiography.
Ono E; Medici Filho E; Faig Leite H; Tanaka JL; De Moraes ME; De Melo Castilho JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 21392686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography in the assessment of external apical root resorption induced by orthodontic therapy: a retrospective study.
Sunku R; Roopesh R; Kancherla P; Perumalla KK; Yudhistar PV; Reddy VS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):422-8. PubMed ID: 22269231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography.
Heo MS; Lee SS; Lee KH; Choi HM; Choi SC; Park TW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 11250638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital subtraction radiography of panoramic radiographs to evaluate maxillary central incisor root resorption after orthodontic treatment.
Ioannidou-Marathiotou I; Papadopoulos MA; Kondylidou-Sidira A; Kokkas A; Karagiannis V
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 20552101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of and file format effect on digital subtraction radiography of simulated external root resorptions.
Gegler A; Mahl C; Fontanella V
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jan; 35(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 16421257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral digital radiography for assessment of tooth root lesions.
Kumar V; Gossett L; Blattner A; Iwasaki LR; Williams K; Nickel JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e533-41. PubMed ID: 21640865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Digital Subtraction Radiography in the Detection of Vertical Root Fractures.
Queiroz PM; Nascimento HA; da Paz TD; Anacleto FN; Freitas DQ
J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):896-9. PubMed ID: 27080116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiographs in diagnosis of lingual-simulated external root resorptions.
Bernardes RA; de Paulo RS; Pereira LO; Duarte MA; Ordinola-Zapata R; de Azevedo JR
Dent Traumatol; 2012 Aug; 28(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 22233265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional and digital radiographic methods in the detection of simulated external root resorptions: a comparative study.
Westphalen VP; Gomes de Moraes I; Westphalen FH; Martins WD; Souza PH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 15533976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Apical root resorption after lingual orthodontic therapy.
Fritz U; Diedrich P; Wiechmann D
J Orofac Orthop; 2003 Nov; 64(6):434-42. PubMed ID: 14628135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of lingual root resorptions in the intraoral radiographs. An experimental study.
Follin ME; Lindvall AM
Swed Dent J; 2005; 29(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 15898362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of simulated internal resorption cavities using digital and digital subtraction radiography: a comparative study.
Stephanopoulos G; Mikrogeorgis G; Lyroudia K
Dent Traumatol; 2011 Oct; 27(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 21762378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Density value means in the evaluation of external apical root resorption: an in vitro study for early detection in orthodontic case simulations.
Eraso FE; Parks ET; Roberts WE; Hohlt WF; Ofner S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 17463096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Apical root resorption of incisors after orthodontic treatment of impacted maxillary canines: a radiographic study.
Brusveen EM; Brudvik P; Bøe OE; Mavragani M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 22464524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
Durack C; Patel S; Davies J; Wilson R; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of conventional film with different digital and digitally filtered images in the detection of simulated internal resorption cavities--an ex vivo study in human cadaver jaws.
Kamburoğlu K; Barenboim SF; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):790-7. PubMed ID: 17942339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of apical root resorption using digital reconstruction.
Reukers E; Sanderink G; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van't Hof M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 9482019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities.
Kamburoğlu K; Kursun S
Int Endod J; 2010 Sep; 43(9):798-807. PubMed ID: 20609023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Digital Periapical Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Natural and Simulated External Root Resorption.
Deliga Schröder ÂG; Westphalen FH; Schröder JC; Fernandes Â; Westphalen VPD
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 29884337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
