These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21392864)

  • 1. [Results of French medical students' ranking exam: The quest for the Holy Grail for students… and medical faculties?].
    Grosbois B
    Rev Med Interne; 2011 Jul; 32(7):397-9. PubMed ID: 21392864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do teaching faculty resources affect the choice of medical career?
    Roussel F; Gehanno JF; Ladner J; Benichou J
    Med Teach; 2006 Dec; 28(8):734-41. PubMed ID: 17594587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Which are the predictive factors to be ranked within the 500 first medical students at the national ranking exam? A cross-sectional study of the 2009 class].
    Karila L; Seringe E; Rouprêt M; Peltier M; Doulaki M; Goumont M; Loyez C; Lefèvre JH
    Rev Med Interne; 2011 Jul; 32(7):400-5. PubMed ID: 21272966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Consequences of critical appraisal of medical literature on 2009 National Ranking in France].
    Lorette G; Jolly D; Ambrosi P; Dreyfuss D; Magne JL; Kohler C; Duhaut P; Gérard JL
    Presse Med; 2010 Jun; 39(6):e118-25. PubMed ID: 20462733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Computerized ranking test in three French universities: Staff experience and students' feedback].
    Roux D; Meyer G; Cymbalista F; Bouaziz JD; Falgarone G; Tesniere A; Gervais J; Cariou A; Peffault de Latour R; Marat M; Moenaert E; Guebli T; Rodriguez O; Lefort A; Dreyfuss D; Hajage D; Ricard JD
    Rev Med Interne; 2016 Mar; 37(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 26827272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Docimology of the national ranking exam in France: a need to better assess medical students’ reasoning].
    Quinton A; Rivière É
    Rev Prat; 2017 Sep; 67(7):716-718. PubMed ID: 30512762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Participation in internship conferences improves the ranking position in French national ranking exam].
    Le Rouzic O; Gosset D; Dharancy S; Lacroix D; Truffert P
    Presse Med; 2015 Sep; 44(9):943-4. PubMed ID: 26341166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Pros and cons of national ranking exam for medical students in France].
    Chabot JM
    Rev Prat; 2008 Oct; 58(16):1805-6. PubMed ID: 19143153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [2010 National Ranking in France: Results, classifications, consequences of critical appraisal of medical literature].
    Jolly D; Lorette G; Ambrosi P; Dreyfuss D; Magne JL; Kohler C; Duhaut P; Gérard JL; Rogez JM
    Presse Med; 2011 Apr; 40(4 Pt 1):447-8. PubMed ID: 21371854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Letter on the article "First steps towards a comparative evaluation of the French medical schools"].
    Grosbois B
    Presse Med; 2010 May; 39(5):616. PubMed ID: 20304600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Faculty as simulated patients (FSPs) in assessing medical students' clinical reasoning skills.
    Abdelkhalek NM; Hussein AM; Sulaiman N; Hamdy H
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2009 Dec; 22(3):323. PubMed ID: 20029766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Forward feeding" about students' progress: the case for longitudinal, progressive, and shared assessment of medical students.
    Cleary L
    Acad Med; 2008 Sep; 83(9):800. PubMed ID: 18728429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis of the discrimination of the final marks after the first computerized national ranking exam in Medicine in June 2016 in France].
    Rivière E; Quinton A; Dehail P
    Rev Med Interne; 2019 May; 40(5):286-290. PubMed ID: 30902508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [National ranking exam 2006: advice of a highly ranked student].
    Girard C
    Rev Prat; 2006 Nov; 56(17):1923-4. PubMed ID: 17243394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What do faculty observe of medical students' clinical performance?
    Pulito AR; Donnelly MB; Plymale M; Mentzer RM
    Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 16626266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [To grade the national ranking exam ... and beyond].
    Chabot JM
    Rev Prat; 2008 Sep; 58(13):1457-8. PubMed ID: 18924332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does socioeconomic status have any influence on success at the national ranking exam?, a prospective survey.
    Bouchghoul H; Teboul JL; Senat MV; Vigoureux S
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):402. PubMed ID: 33138812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Faculty and resident evaluations of medical students on a surgery clerkship correlate poorly with standardized exam scores.
    Goldstein SD; Lindeman B; Colbert-Getz J; Arbella T; Dudas R; Lidor A; Sacks B
    Am J Surg; 2014 Feb; 207(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 24239528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of faculty members' and students' perceptions concerning performance criteria and evaluation strategies at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine.
    Conran PB; Obenshain SS; Anderson RE
    Acad Med; 1991 Sep; 66(9):553-7. PubMed ID: 1883455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [National ranking exam. Advice from a highly ranked student].
    Sobanski V
    Rev Prat; 2009 Oct; 59(8):1117-8. PubMed ID: 19894455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.