These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21392913)
1. Clinical benefit of power-injectable port systems: a prospective observational study. Teichgräber UK; Nagel SN; Kausche S; Enzweiler C Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):528-33. PubMed ID: 21392913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems. Teichgräber UK; Streitparth F; Cho CH; Benter T; Gebauer B Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Sep; 32(5):975-9. PubMed ID: 19085032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Experiences with power-injectable port systems: complications, patient satisfaction and clinical benefit]. Chang DH; Kabbasch C; Bovenschulte H; Libicher M; Maintz D; Bangard C Rofo; 2013 May; 185(5):454-60. PubMed ID: 23616022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Contrast media pressure injection using a portal catheter system--results of an in vitro study]. Gebauer B; Teichgräber UK; Hothan T; Felix R; Wagner HJ Rofo; 2005 Oct; 177(10):1417-23. PubMed ID: 16170712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Power injectable peripherally inserted central venous catheter lines frequently flip after power injection of contrast. Lozano LA; Marn C; Goodman LR J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 22805672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population. Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Power-injectable ports: safety during placement, therapeutic use, and contrast administration during computed tomography procedures. Alexander MD; Morrison HL J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 22610789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and feasibility of using a central venous catheter for rapid contrast injection rates. Sanelli PC; Deshmukh M; Ougorets I; Caiati R; Heier LA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1829-34. PubMed ID: 15547237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients. Lorch H; Zwaan M; Kagel C; Weiss HD Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients. Goltz JP; Scholl A; Ritter CO; Wittenberg G; Hahn D; Kickuth R Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Dec; 33(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 20414657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The late complications of totally implantable central venous access ports: the results from an Italian multicenter prospective observation study. Dal Molin A; Rasero L; Guerretta L; Perfetti E; Clerico M Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Dec; 15(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 21167777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days. Busch JD; Herrmann J; Heller F; Derlin T; Koops A; Adam G; Habermann CR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 22826411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Power injection of contrast media using central venous catheters: feasibility, safety, and efficacy. Herts BR; O'Malley CM; Wirth SL; Lieber ML; Pohlman B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Feb; 176(2):447-53. PubMed ID: 11159092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors predicting subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the relationship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Cohn DE; Mutch DG; Rader JS; Farrell M; Awantang R; Herzog TJ Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 11733967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double-lumen central venous port catheters: simultaneous application for chemotherapy and parenteral nutrition in cancer patients. Teichgräber UK; Nagel SN; Kausche S; Streitparth F; Cho CH J Vasc Access; 2010; 11(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 20954131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [First experiences with intravenous port systems authorized for high pressure injection of contrast agent in multiphasic computed tomography]. Wieners G; Redlich U; Dudeck O; Schütte K; Ricke J; Pech M Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):664-8. PubMed ID: 19517341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience. Lee SH; Chun HJ; Choi BG Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High pressure versus standard port system: comparison of implantation and complications. Plumhans C; Ocklenburg C; Verburg FA; Günther RW; Behrendt FF J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Oct; 56(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 23043572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The fluoroscopy-guided implantation of subcutaneous venous ports: the complications and long-term results]. Kluge A; Stroh H; Wagner D; Rauber K Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 9711285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of power contrast injections and bolus triggering during CT scans in oncologic patients with totally implantable venous access ports of the forearm. Goltz JP; Machann W; Noack C; Hahn D; Kickuth R Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 21498324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]