These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21393553)
1. Effect of biomimetic deposition on anodized titanium surfaces. Kim MH; Lee SY; Kim MJ; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY J Dent Res; 2011 Jun; 90(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 21393553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface modifications and cell-materials interactions with anodized Ti. Das K; Bose S; Bandyopadhyay A Acta Biomater; 2007 Jul; 3(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 17320494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces. Pae A; Kim SS; Kim HS; Woo YH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21691593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhanced osteoblast response to hydrophilic strontium and/or phosphate ions-incorporated titanium oxide surfaces. Park JW; Kim YJ; Jang JH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Apr; 21(4):398-408. PubMed ID: 20128830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TiO2 nanotubes on Ti: Influence of nanoscale morphology on bone cell-materials interaction. Das K; Bose S; Bandyopadhyay A J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jul; 90(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 18496867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro comparison of possibly bioactive titanium implant surfaces. Göransson A; Arvidsson A; Currie F; Franke-Stenport V; Kjellin P; Mustafa K; Sul YT; Wennerberg A J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):1037-47. PubMed ID: 18404711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osteoclastic Response on Titanium Surfaces in Modified Simulated Body Fluid. Kim MH; Lee SY; Heo SJ; Kim SK; Kim MJ; Koak JY Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 28291852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osteoblast activity on anodized titania nanotubes: effect of simulated body fluid soaking time. Bayram C; Demirbilek M; Calişkan N; Demirbilek ME; Denkbaş EB J Biomed Nanotechnol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):482-90. PubMed ID: 22764418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of surface treatment on cell responses to grades 4 and 5 titanium for orthodontic mini-implants. Galli C; Piemontese M; Ravanetti F; Lumetti S; Passeri G; Gandolfini M; Macaluso GM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 22640672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of chemically modified titanium surfaces on protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell behavior. Protivínský J; Appleford M; Strnad J; Helebrant A; Ong JL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 17929514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preparation and characterization of anodized titanium surfaces and their effect on osteoblast responses. Kim KH; Kwon TY; Kim SY; Kang IK; Kim S; Yang Y; Ong JL J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 16526576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biological responses in osteoblast-like cell line according to thin layer hydroxyapatite coatings on anodized titanium. Sohn SH; Jun HK; Kim CS; Kim KN; Chung SM; Shin SW; Ryu JJ; Kim MK J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):898-911. PubMed ID: 17168932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A bone-like precoating strategy for implants: collagen immobilization and mineralization on pure titanium implant surface. Munisamy S; Vaidyanathan TK; Vaidyanathan J J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18478901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of different titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant surfaces on phenotypic expression of human bone-derived cells. Knabe C; Howlett CR; Klar F; Zreiqat H J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Oct; 71(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 15368259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of calcium gluconate in electrochemical activation of titanium for biomimetic coating of calcium phosphate. Shibli SM; Mathai S J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Dec; 87(4):994-1002. PubMed ID: 18257080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of surface implant treatments on the biological behavior of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. An in vitro comparative study. Conserva E; Menini M; Ravera G; Pera P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):880-9. PubMed ID: 22251013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro osteoblast response to anodized titanium and anodized titanium followed by hydrothermal treatment. Rodriguez R; Kim K; Ong JL J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Jun; 65(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 12746882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selective cell affinity of biomimetic micro-nano-hybrid structured TiO2 overcomes the biological dilemma of osteoblasts. Hori N; Iwasa F; Ueno T; Takeuchi K; Tsukimura N; Yamada M; Hattori M; Yamamoto A; Ogawa T Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):275-87. PubMed ID: 20006380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]