205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21393939)
1. Why your manuscript was rejected and how to prevent it.
Dogra S
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2011; 77(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 21393939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Kindness, gentility, and rejection: an analysis of 99 manuscript reviews.
Robinson JD; Agne RR
Health Commun; 2010 Sep; 25(6-7):504-11. PubMed ID: 20845127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ensuring the quality of peer-review process.
Afifi M
Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1253. PubMed ID: 16883466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How to write a paper: revising your manuscript.
Su'a B; MacFater WS; Hill AG
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Mar; 87(3):195-197. PubMed ID: 27905185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rejection: giving it and taking it.
Taylor D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Oct; 1(4):275. PubMed ID: 19627792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Debate on peer review. Report from an international congress on peer review].
Grimby G
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3109-10. PubMed ID: 12198929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An open letter to WJNR reviewers.
Brink PJ
West J Nurs Res; 2003 Apr; 25(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 12705110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Suggestions for reviewing manuscripts.
Alexandrov AV; Hennerici MG; Norrving B
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2009; 28(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 19602875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [More stringent requirements concerning manuscripts. Declarations of potential connections and conflicts of interest published in the Lakartidningen].
Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Agren H; Ostergren J
Lakartidningen; 2002 Apr; 99(15):1662-3. PubMed ID: 12025190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
Jefferson T; Shashok K
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts.
Silberzweig JE; Khorsandi AS
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1620-3. PubMed ID: 18693043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.
Provenzale JM; Stanley RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):848-54. PubMed ID: 16177399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cause, correlation, conjecture.
Nat Genet; 2015 Apr; 47(4):305. PubMed ID: 25814304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tits and tots of revising a manuscript.
Dogra S; Sarangal R
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2013; 79(6):733-6. PubMed ID: 24177603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. After the critique: revise and resubmit your manuscript.
Valente S
Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 16189960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
