These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21393954)

  • 1. Patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in North India.
    Handa S; Jindal R
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2011; 77(2):194-6. PubMed ID: 21393954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contact dermatitis: clinical review of 800 patients tested using the standard European series.
    Serra-Baldrich E; Lluch M; Valero A; Malet A; Gimenez Camarasa JM
    Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 1995; 23(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 8526169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contact sensitivity to topical corticosteroids in India.
    Sahu U; Handa S; De D
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2016; 82(2):184-6. PubMed ID: 26374658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Characteristics of patients with hand dermatitis referred to the contact dermatitis unit of a tertiary hospital and impact of patch testing on diagnosis].
    Carrascosa JM; Benvenuti F; Rodríguez C; Ferrándiz C
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2009; 100(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 19709554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Test results in 1008 patients with contact allergy].
    Lämmer D
    Z Hautkr; 1979 Jun; 54(12):571-9. PubMed ID: 463180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prick test and patch test].
    Shono M
    Arerugi; 2008 Feb; 57(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 18349584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anogenital dermatitis in patients referred for patch testing: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2004.
    Warshaw EM; Furda LM; Maibach HI; Rietschel RL; Fowler JF; Belsito DV; Zug KA; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jun; 144(6):749-55. PubMed ID: 18559763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinically relevant contact allergy to formaldehyde may be missed by testing with formaldehyde 1·0%.
    Hauksson I; Pontén A; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M; Bruze M
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Mar; 164(3):568-72. PubMed ID: 21114477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
    Lazarov A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of contact dermatitis using the TRUE patch test.
    Wright RW
    J Ark Med Soc; 1991 Nov; 88(6):271-2. PubMed ID: 1800484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Means to an end, not the end.
    Nedorost S; Zirwas M
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jun; 144(6):788-90. PubMed ID: 18559772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis: is it useful to perform the cosmetic series in addition to the European standard series?
    Ada S; Seçkin D
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1192-6. PubMed ID: 20236197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
    Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contact urticaria to commercial fish in atopic persons.
    Beck HI; Nissen BK
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1983; 63(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 6192649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
    Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Positive patch test reaction without clinical contact dermatitis--what is the best approach in medico-legal evaluation?].
    Fartasch M; Drexler H; Diepgen TL; John SM; Brandenburg S
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2008 Jan; 6(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 18190432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Contact dermatitis in children].
    Gonçalo S; Sousa I; Freitas JD
    Acta Med Port; 1984 Mar; 5(3):87-90. PubMed ID: 6731031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis among school children and teenagers with eczema.
    Czarnobilska E; Obtulowicz K; Dyga W; Wsolek-Wnek K; Spiewak R
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 May; 60(5):264-9. PubMed ID: 19397618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contact dermatitis due to Parthenium hysterophorus.
    Siddiqui MA; Singh R; Sharma RC
    Indian J Med Res; 1978 Sep; 68():481-4. PubMed ID: 744635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.