These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21394888)

  • 21. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients.
    Higgins JP; Whitehead A; Turner RM; Omar RZ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(15):2219-41. PubMed ID: 11468761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiple imputation under Bayesianly smoothed pattern-mixture models for non-ignorable drop-out.
    Demirtas H
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2345-63. PubMed ID: 15977286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results.
    Furukawa TA; Barbui C; Cipriani A; Brambilla P; Watanabe N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 16360555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Uncertainty method improved on best-worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis.
    Gamble C; Hollis S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):579-88. PubMed ID: 15878471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Constructing intervals for the intracluster correlation coefficient using Bayesian modelling, and application in cluster randomized trials.
    Turner RM; Omar RZ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1443-56. PubMed ID: 16220510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation.
    Thiessen Philbrook H; Barrowman N; Garg AX
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 17292016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review.
    Weir CJ; Butcher I; Assi V; Lewis SC; Murray GD; Langhorne P; Brady MC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):25. PubMed ID: 29514597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Imputations of missing values in practice: results from imputations of serum cholesterol in 28 cohort studies.
    Barzi F; Woodward M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 160(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 15229115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.
    Floden L; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):161. PubMed ID: 31345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Missing data on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: a comparison of 4 imputation techniques.
    Bono C; Ried LD; Kimberlin C; Vogel B
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Mar; 3(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 17350555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An extended general location model for causal inferences from data subject to noncompliance and missing values.
    Peng Y; Little RJ; Raghunathan TE
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):598-607. PubMed ID: 15339281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Allowing for uncertainty due to missing continuous outcome data in pairwise and network meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; White IR; Higgins JP; Cipriani A; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):721-41. PubMed ID: 25393541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling the value for money of changing clinical practice change: a stochastic application in diabetes care.
    Hoomans T; Abrams KR; Ament AJ; Evers SM; Severens JL
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19648827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multiple imputation for missing laboratory data: an example from infectious disease epidemiology.
    Mulla ZD; Seo B; Kalamegham R; Nuwayhid BS
    Ann Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 19(12):908-14. PubMed ID: 19811933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Model averaging in the presence of structural uncertainty about treatment effects: influence on treatment decision and expected value of information.
    Price MJ; Welton NJ; Briggs AH; Ades AE
    Value Health; 2011; 14(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 21402291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Data cloning: easy maximum likelihood estimation for complex ecological models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.
    Lele SR; Dennis B; Lutscher F
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Jul; 10(7):551-63. PubMed ID: 17542934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variable selection under multiple imputation using the bootstrap in a prognostic study.
    Heymans MW; van Buuren S; Knol DL; van Mechelen W; de Vet HC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jul; 7():33. PubMed ID: 17629912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.