358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21395638)
1. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review.
Chaar MS; Att W; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Sep; 38(9):697-711. PubMed ID: 21395638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CA; de Souza Batista VE; Almeida DA; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 26589441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications.
Ma S; Fenton A
Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):127-45. PubMed ID: 25822297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions--a systematic review.
Wittneben JG; Millen C; Brägger U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():84-98. PubMed ID: 24660192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of prosthesis type and retention mechanism on complications with fixed implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review applying multivariate analyses.
Millen C; Brägger U; Wittneben JG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 25615920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up.
Mangano F; Macchi A; Caprioglio A; Sammons RL; Piattelli A; Mangano C
J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 24750435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical observation of screw and cement-retained implant-supported restoration of fixed bridges].
Song T; Xu PC; Li Y
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Jun; 20(3):296-9. PubMed ID: 21779741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of a Fractured Multiunit Maxillary Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis with Stripped Abutment Screws Using a Hybrid Cement-Retained and Screw-Retained Design: A 5-Year Follow-Up Clinical Report.
Al Amri MD
J Prosthodont; 2016 Jun; 25(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 26713868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Results and Technical Complications of Posterior Implant-Supported Modified Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns and Short-Span Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 2-Year Pilot Study.
Cheng CW; Chien CH; Chen CJ; Papaspyridakos P
J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29086467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of screw- versus cement-retained implant-supported fixed restorations.
Sherif S; Susarla HK; Kapos T; Munoz D; Chang BM; Wright RF
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jan; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24382004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective analysis of loosening of cement-retained vs screw-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions.
Korsch M; Walther W
Quintessence Int; 2015; 46(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 25918762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).
Pjetursson BE; Brägger U; Lang NP; Zwahlen M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():97-113. PubMed ID: 17594374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Current Perspective on Screw-Retained Single-Implant Restorations: A Review of Pertinent Literature.
Priest G
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 May; 29(3):161-171. PubMed ID: 28112854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].
Harel N; Livne S; Piek D; Marku-Cohen S; Ormianer Z
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):19-25, 63. PubMed ID: 22991873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of various fixation parameters on strain development of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
Schittenhelm B; Karl M; Graef F; Heckmann S; Taylor T
Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 23534049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complications of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported full-arch restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gaddale R; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2020; 13(1):11-40. PubMed ID: 32186285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of modifying implant screw access channels on the amount of extruded excess cement and retention of cement-retained implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review.
Davoudi A; Rismanchian M
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30006223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ten-year survival and complication rates of lithium-disilicate (Empress 2) tooth-supported crowns, implant-supported crowns, and fixed dental prostheses.
Teichmann M; Göckler F; Weber V; Yildirim M; Wolfart S; Edelhoff D
J Dent; 2017 Jan; 56():65-77. PubMed ID: 27984088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
