These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Is the Ebbinghaus illusion a size contrast illusion? Todorović D; Jovanović L Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():180-187. PubMed ID: 29499478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attending to illusory differences in object size. Jefferies LN; Gmeindl L; Yantis S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jul; 76(5):1393-402. PubMed ID: 24696380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ebbinghaus illusion depends more on the retinal than perceived size of surrounding stimuli. Takao S; Clifford CWG; Watanabe K Vision Res; 2019 Jan; 154():80-84. PubMed ID: 30389387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Position shifts of fMRI-based population receptive fields in human visual cortex induced by Ponzo illusion. He D; Mo C; Wang Y; Fang F Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3535-41. PubMed ID: 26314755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Opposite effects of motion dynamics on the Ebbinghaus and corridor illusions. Mruczek REB; Blair CD; Cullen K; Caplovitz GP Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1912-1927. PubMed ID: 31898067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The combination of target motion and dynamic changes in context greatly enhance visual size illusions. Mruczek REB; Fanelli M; Kelly S; Caplovitz GP Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():959367. PubMed ID: 36188172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subconscious processing reveals dissociable contextual modulations of visual size perception. Chen L; Qiao C; Wang Y; Jiang Y Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():259-267. PubMed ID: 30096483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Ebbinghaus illusion with small inducers appears larger on the right side. Saneyoshi A Exp Brain Res; 2018 Apr; 236(4):933-944. PubMed ID: 29368080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A depth illusion supports the model of General Object Constancy: Size and depth constancies related by a same distance-scaling factor. Qian J; Petrov Y Vision Res; 2016 Dec; 129():77-86. PubMed ID: 27810350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rescaling retinal size into perceived size: evidence for an occipital and parietal bottleneck. Kreutzer S; Weidner R; Fink GR J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 27(7):1334-43. PubMed ID: 25603028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Top-Down Feedback Controls the Cortical Representation of Illusory Contours in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex. Pak A; Ryu E; Li C; Chubykin AA J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(3):648-660. PubMed ID: 31792152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]