BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21397332)

  • 1. Analysis of currently available data for characterising the risk of engineered nanomaterials to the environment and human health--lessons learned from four case studies.
    Aschberger K; Micheletti C; Sokull-Klüttgen B; Christensen FM
    Environ Int; 2011 Aug; 37(6):1143-56. PubMed ID: 21397332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hazard assessments of manufactured nanomaterials.
    Morimoto Y; Kobayashi N; Shinohara N; Myojo T; Tanaka I; Nakanishi J
    J Occup Health; 2010; 52(6):325-34. PubMed ID: 20972355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes).
    Coll C; Notter D; Gottschalk F; Sun T; Som C; Nowack B
    Nanotoxicology; 2016; 10(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 26554717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental exposure assessment of engineered nanoparticles: why REACH needs adjustment.
    Meesters JA; Veltman K; Hendriks AJ; van de Meent D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e15-26. PubMed ID: 23633247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextiles and façade coatings.
    Som C; Wick P; Krug H; Nowack B
    Environ Int; 2011 Aug; 37(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 21397331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Carbon nanomaterials: their environmental behavior and effects on the transport and fate of pollutants in environment].
    Xu L; Duan L; Chen W
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2009 Jan; 20(1):205-12. PubMed ID: 19449587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk assessment strategies for nanoscale and fine-sized titanium dioxide particles: Recognizing hazard and exposure issues.
    Warheit DB; Donner EM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 85():138-47. PubMed ID: 26362081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials.
    Colvin VL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):1166-70. PubMed ID: 14520401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental implications of nanomaterials: are we studying the right thing?
    Turco RF; Bischoff M; Tong ZH; Nies L
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2011 Aug; 22(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 21742482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decreasing uncertainties in assessing environmental exposure, risk, and ecological implications of nanomaterials.
    Wiesner MR; Lowry GV; Jones KL; Hochella MF; Di Giulio RT; Casman E; Bernhardt ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 43(17):6458-62. PubMed ID: 19764202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials.
    Scott-Fordsmand JJ; Peijnenburg WJGM; Semenzin E; Nowack B; Hunt N; Hristozov D; Marcomini A; Irfan MA; Jiménez AS; Landsiedel R; Tran L; Oomen AG; Bos PMJ; Hund-Rinke K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 29048395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Demonstration of a modelling-based multi-criteria decision analysis procedure for prioritisation of occupational risks from manufactured nanomaterials.
    Hristozov D; Zabeo A; Alstrup Jensen K; Gottardo S; Isigonis P; Maccalman L; Critto A; Marcomini A
    Nanotoxicology; 2016 Nov; 10(9):1215-28. PubMed ID: 26853193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The carcinogenic potential of nanomaterials, their release from products and options for regulating them.
    Becker H; Herzberg F; Schulte A; Kolossa-Gehring M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2011 Jun; 214(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 21168363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk.
    Cohen Y; Rallo R; Liu R; Liu HH
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):802-12. PubMed ID: 23138971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Material-specific properties applied to an environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials - implications on grouping and read-across concepts.
    Wigger H; Nowack B
    Nanotoxicology; 2019 Jun; 13(5):623-643. PubMed ID: 30727799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paradigms to assess the environmental impact of manufactured nanomaterials.
    Klaine SJ; Koelmans AA; Horne N; Carley S; Handy RD; Kapustka L; Nowack B; von der Kammer F
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Jan; 31(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22162122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of carbon nanotubes toxicity and exposure--appraisal of human health risk assessment based on open literature.
    Aschberger K; Johnston HJ; Stone V; Aitken RJ; Hankin SM; Peters SA; Tran CL; Christensen FM
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Oct; 40(9):759-90. PubMed ID: 20860524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chemical alternatives assessment of different flame retardants - A case study including multi-walled carbon nanotubes as synergist.
    Aschberger K; Campia I; Pesudo LQ; Radovnikovic A; Reina V
    Environ Int; 2017 Apr; 101():27-45. PubMed ID: 28161204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of fullerene toxicity and exposure--appraisal of a human health risk assessment, based on open literature.
    Aschberger K; Johnston HJ; Stone V; Aitken RJ; Tran CL; Hankin SM; Peters SA; Christensen FM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):455-73. PubMed ID: 20800639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of exposure concentrations used in assessing manufactured nanomaterial environmental hazards: are they relevant?
    Holden PA; Klaessig F; Turco RF; Priester JH; Rico CM; Avila-Arias H; Mortimer M; Pacpaco K; Gardea-Torresdey JL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):10541-51. PubMed ID: 25158225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.