BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21398004)

  • 1. Does skeletal facial profile influence preoperative motives and postoperative satisfaction? A prospective study of 66 surgical-orthodontic patients.
    Øland J; Jensen J; Papadopoulos MA; Melsen B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):2025-32. PubMed ID: 21398004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
    Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in bite force and dentoskeletal morphology in prognathic patients after orthognathic surgery.
    Harada K; Kikuchi T; Morishima S; Sato M; Ohkura K; Omura K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 12789142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in orthodontic patients.
    Bos A; Hoogstraten J; Prahl-Andersen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 12594417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motives for surgical-orthodontic treatment and effect of treatment on psychosocial well-being and satisfaction: a prospective study of 118 patients.
    Oland J; Jensen J; Elklit A; Melsen B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 21050649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.
    Kuroda S; Murakami K; Morishige Y; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semirigid fixation of mandible and maxilla in orthognathic surgery: stability and advantages.
    Mavili ME; Canter HI; Saglam-Aydinatay B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Oct; 63(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 19745712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of motivation and psychological characteristics of adult orthodontic patients.
    Pabari S; Moles DR; Cunningham SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e263-72. PubMed ID: 22133960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are personality patterns and clinical syndromes associated with patients' motives and perceived outcome of orthognathic surgery?
    Øland J; Jensen J; Melsen B; Elklit A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 68(12):3007-14. PubMed ID: 21095506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anteroposterior position of mandible and perceived need for orthognathic surgery.
    de Almeida MD; Bittencourt MA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 19070751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 3-year patient-centred follow-up of 516 consecutively treated orthognathic surgery patients.
    Espeland L; Høgevold HE; Stenvik A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 18033770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonorthodontic orthognathic surgery.
    Schleich AR; Eppley BL
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1478-83. PubMed ID: 19816282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motivating factors for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery evaluation.
    Proothi M; Drew SJ; Sachs SA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1555-9. PubMed ID: 20434252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Shelly AD; Southard TE; Southard KA; Casko JS; Jakobsen JR; Fridrich KL; Mergen JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 10842105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The long term stability after orthognathic surgery in prognathic patients with mandibular asymmetry].
    Lai W; Kazuhiro Y; Kooji H; Ritsuo T; Tadaharu K
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2003 Jan; 34(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 15600196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with facial appearance in Nigerian orthodontic patients.
    Onyeaso CO; Utomi IL
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2004 Dec; 27(108):37-41. PubMed ID: 15853277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.