BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21398034)

  • 21. Chemistry: It's not easy being green.
    Sanderson K
    Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7328):18-20. PubMed ID: 21209638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Life cycle based risk assessment of recycled materials in roadway construction.
    Carpenter AC; Gardner KH; Fopiano J; Benson CH; Edil TB
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(10):1458-64. PubMed ID: 17499986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using the EPC approach to develop health-based soil and water screening concentrations for environmental chemicals.
    Williams CA; James RC; Freeman RW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Aug; 22(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 7494905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Incorporation of potential for multimedia exposure into chemical hazard scores for pollution prevention.
    Whaley DA; Meloy TP; Barrett SS; Bedillion EJ
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1999 Feb; 22(1):241-73. PubMed ID: 10189582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Control of chemicals in Sweden: an example of misuse of the "precautionary principle".
    Nilsson R
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2004 Feb; 57(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 14759655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A discussion of the U.S. EPA methodology for determining Water Quality Standards (WQS).
    Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg KE
    Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 1344674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A web-based tool to engage stakeholders in informing research planning for future decisions on emerging materials.
    Powers CM; Grieger KD; Hendren CO; Meacham CA; Gurevich G; Lassiter MG; Money ES; Lloyd JM; Beaulieu SM
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():660-8. PubMed ID: 24176714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency strategic plan for evaluating the toxicity of chemicals.
    Firestone M; Kavlock R; Zenick H; Kramer M;
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):139-62. PubMed ID: 20574895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.
    Thorneloe SA; Weitz K; Jambeck J
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1006-20. PubMed ID: 17433663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A framework for assessing the impact of land use policy on community exposure to air toxics.
    Willis MR; Keller AA
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(2):213-27. PubMed ID: 16842900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of current good manufacturing practices and emission regulations and guidances on the discharge of pharmaceutical chemicals into the environment from manufacturing, use, and disposal.
    Velagaleti R; Burns PK; Gill M; Prothro J
    Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Mar; 110(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 11882470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a novel high throughput screening tool for relative emissions of industrial chemicals used in chemical products.
    Undeman E; Fischer S; McLachlan MS
    Chemosphere; 2011 Feb; 82(7):996-1001. PubMed ID: 21074823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uncertainties for endocrine disrupters: our view on progress.
    Daston GP; Cook JC; Kavlock RJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2003 Aug; 74(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 12730617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. U.S. EPA to revisit asbestos toxicity.
    Renner R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):1808-9. PubMed ID: 17410766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risks of toxic ash from artisanal mining of discarded cellphones.
    Hibbert K; Ogunseitan OA
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Aug; 278():1-7. PubMed ID: 24937657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distribution of heavy metals and hydrocarbon contents in an alfisol contaminated with waste-lubricating oil amended with organic wastes.
    Adesodun JK; Mbagwu JS
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 May; 99(8):3195-204. PubMed ID: 17616460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chemicals of emerging concern in the Great Lakes Basin: an analysis of environmental exposures.
    Klecka G; Persoon C; Currie R
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 207():1-93. PubMed ID: 20652664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment and application of national environmental databases and mapping tools at the local level to two community case studies.
    Hammond D; Conlon K; Barzyk T; Chahine T; Zartarian V; Schultz B
    Risk Anal; 2011 Mar; 31(3):475-87. PubMed ID: 21077925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mercury regulation, fate, transport, transformation, and abatement within cement manufacturing facilities: review.
    Sikkema JK; Alleman JE; Ong SK; Wheelock TD
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(20):4167-78. PubMed ID: 21783227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals. I. Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations.
    Hommen U; Baveco JM; Galic N; van den Brink PJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 20821697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.