BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

994 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21398092)

  • 1. Additional orthognathic surgery following Le Fort III and monobloc advancement.
    Nout E; Koudstaal MJ; Wolvius EB; Van der Wal KG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):679-84. PubMed ID: 21398092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Le Fort IV + I distraction osteogenesis using an internal device for syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Sakamoto Y; Nakajima H; Tamada I; Sakamoto T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):788-95. PubMed ID: 24280175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midfacial distraction without osteotomy using a transfacial pin and external devices.
    Coeugniet E; Dhellemmes P; Vinchon M; Wolber A; Pellerin P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):184-9. PubMed ID: 22337404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orbitofrontal monobloc advancement for Crouzon syndrome.
    Laure B; Moret A; Joly A; Travers N; Listrat A; Krastinova D; Goga D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e335-8. PubMed ID: 24530078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis in syndromal craniosynostosis.
    Meling TR; Hans-Erik H; Per S; Due-Tonnessen BJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 16432404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Respiratory outcome of midface advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.
    Mathijssen I; Arnaud E; Marchac D; Mireau E; Morisseau-Durand MP; Guérin P; Renier D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 17(4):642-4. PubMed ID: 16877907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Respiratory outcome of mid-face advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.
    Mathijssen I; Arnaud E; Marchac D; Mireau E; Morisseau-Durand MP; Guérin P; Renier D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 17(5):880-2. PubMed ID: 17003615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Midface distraction osteogenesis: internal vs. external devices.
    Meling TR; Høgevold HE; Due-Tønnessen BJ; Skjelbred P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21109402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Upper airway changes in syndromic craniosynostosis patients following midface or monobloc advancement: correlation between volume changes and respiratory outcome.
    Nout E; Bannink N; Koudstaal MJ; Veenland JF; Joosten KF; Poublon RM; van der Wal KG; Mathijssen IM; Wolvius EB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 40(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 21624836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vector control in internal midface distraction using temporary anchorage devices.
    Francis C; Rommer E; Mancho S; Carey J; Hammoudeh JA; Urata MM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2000-3. PubMed ID: 23154368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.
    He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monobloc minus Le Fort II for single-stage treatment of the Apert phenotype.
    Paliga JT; Goldstein JA; Storm PB; Taylor JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1380-2. PubMed ID: 24015416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The assessment of midface distraction osteogenesis in treatment of upper airway obstruction.
    Xu H; Yu Z; Mu X
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1876-81. PubMed ID: 19816368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Wery MF; Nada RM; van der Meulen JJ; Wolvius EB; Ongkosuwito EM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 25605236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Midface correction in patients with Crouzon syndrome is Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device the gold standard?
    Engel M; Berger M; Hoffmann J; Kühle R; Rückschloss T; Ristow O; Freudlsperger C; Kansy K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 30642732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of obstructive sleep apnea by maxillomandibular advancement.
    Boyd SB
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2009 Nov; 21(4):447-57. PubMed ID: 19944345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopically assisted intraoral modified Le Fort II type midfacial advancement using piezoelectric surgery and an intraoperative RED system.
    Hara S; Mitsugi M; Kanno T; Nomachi A; Kawakami S; Tatemoto Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e93-103. PubMed ID: 23351774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-directional Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an individual prefabricated device.
    Klammert U; Böhm H; Schweitzer T; Würzler K; Gbureck U; Reuther J; Kübler A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 37(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 19157890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of orthognathic surgery on ventilation during sleep.
    Foltán R; Hoffmannová J; Pavlíková G; Hanzelka T; Klíma K; Horká E; Adámek S; Sedý J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 21074368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lateral cephalometry changes after SARPE.
    Parhiz A; Schepers S; Lambrichts I; Vrielinck L; Sun Y; Politis C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):662-71. PubMed ID: 21489753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.