These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2140121)

  • 1. Stress X-rays and the low back pain patient.
    Phillips RB; Howe JW; Bustin G; Mick TJ; Rosenfeld I; Mills T
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990; 13(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 2140121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interrater reliability of roentgenological evaluation of the lumbar spine in lateral bending.
    Haas M; Nyiendo J; Peterson C; Thiel H; Sellers T; Cassidy D; Ken YH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 May; 13(4):179-89. PubMed ID: 2141056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extension-flexion radiographs for motion studies of the lumbar spine. A comparison of two methods.
    Putto E; Tallroth K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1990 Feb; 15(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 2139240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lumbar motion trends and correlation with low back pain. Part II. A roentgenological evaluation of quantitative segmental motion in lateral bending.
    Haas M; Nyiendo J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 May; 15(4):224-34. PubMed ID: 1386100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chiropractic biomechanical evaluations: validity in myofascial low back pain.
    Brunarski DJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1982 Dec; 5(4):155-61. PubMed ID: 6219180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lumbar motion trends and correlation with low back pain. Part I. A roentgenological evaluation of coupled lumbar motion in lateral bending.
    Haas M; Nyiendo J; Peterson C; Thiel H; Sellers T; Dal Mas E; Kirton C; Cassidy D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992; 15(3):145-58. PubMed ID: 1533415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The functional radiographic examination of patients with low-back pain: a study of different forms of variations.
    Bronfort G; Jochumsen OH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1984 Jun; 7(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 6235304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A roentgenological evaluation of the relationship between segmental motion and malalignment in lateral bending.
    Haas M; Peterson D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992; 15(6):350-60. PubMed ID: 1431618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low back pain: a radiographic enigma.
    Phillips RB; Frymoyer JW; Mac Pherson BV; Newburg AH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1986 Sep; 9(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 2945887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A digitizing technique for the study of movement of intradiscal dye in response to flexion and extension of the lumbar spine.
    Schnebel BE; Simmons JW; Chowning J; Davidson R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1988 Mar; 13(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 2968665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intersegmental sagittal motion in the lower cervical spine and discogenic spondylosis: a preliminary study.
    Good CJ; Mikkelsen GB
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992; 15(9):556-64. PubMed ID: 1469339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic mobility of the lumbar spine and its relation to clinical back motion.
    Korpi J; Poussa M; Heliövaara M
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1988; 20(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 2970111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional roentgenometric evaluation of the cervical spine in the sagittal plane.
    Henderson DJ; Dormon TM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1985 Dec; 8(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 4078501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plain film radiology in chiropractic.
    Phillips RB
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Jan; 15(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1531491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis by chiropractic radiography: Part II. Effects of X-ray projectional distortion on apparent vertebral rotation.
    Zengel F; Davis BP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1988 Oct; 11(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 3235925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inability to prove instability. A critical appraisal of clinical-radiological flexion-extension studies in lumbar disc degeneration.
    Penning L; Wilmink JT; van Woerden HH
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 6236010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low back pain and x-rays.
    Taylor HK
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1970 Mar; 16(3):1-6 contd. PubMed ID: 4245643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The patient with back pain and the family physician. Problem solving with simple methods].
    Weihmayr T
    MMW Fortschr Med; 1999 Jun; 141(22):39-40. PubMed ID: 10468474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of a single lumbar spine radiograph in low back pain.
    Padley S; Gleeson F; Chisholm R; Baldwin J
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Jul; 63(751):535-6. PubMed ID: 2143958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional spinal coupling mechanics: Part II. Implications for chiropractic theories and practice.
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Troyanovich SJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 9567238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.