202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21401749)
1. Two-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary molars class I and II restorations.
da Franca C; Colares V; Van Amerongen E
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jul; 21(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21401749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
Markovic D; Peric T
Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
Smales RJ; Yip HK
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination.
Carvalho TS; Sampaio FC; Diniz A; Bönecker M; Van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 20642474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E
J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth.
Louw AJ; Sarvan I; Chikte UM; Honkala E
SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up.
Deepa G; Shobha T
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of a chlorhexidine containing cavity disinfectant on the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement following ART: 24-month results.
Ersin NK; Aykut A; Candan U; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18435375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.
Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment restorations and sealants under field conditions.
Motsei SM; Kroon J; Holtshousen WS
SADJ; 2001 Jul; 56(7):309-15. PubMed ID: 11575114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.
Phonghanyudh A; Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Petersen PE
Community Dent Health; 2012 Jun; 29(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22779380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
Dutta BN; Gauba K; Tewari A; Chawla HS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed.
Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE; Mwalili SM
Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21703078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
