These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21401770)

  • 1. Is the weighted z-test the best method for combining probabilities from independent tests?
    Chen Z
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Apr; 24(4):926-30. PubMed ID: 21401770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach.
    Whitlock MC
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1368-73. PubMed ID: 16135132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimally weighted Z-test is a powerful method for combining probabilities in meta-analysis.
    Zaykin DV
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Aug; 24(8):1836-41. PubMed ID: 21605215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of statistical methods for combining relative bioactivities from parallel line bioassays.
    Mzolo T; Hendriks M; van den Heuvel E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 24123711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple method for inference on an overall effect in meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4531-43. PubMed ID: 17397112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalized inferences on the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed outcomes.
    Tian L
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 18318039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inferences about the between-study variance in meta-analysis with normally distributed outcomes.
    Tian L
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 18383448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Random-effects meta-analysis of correlations: Monte Carlo evaluation of mean estimators.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):227-54. PubMed ID: 19527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: attempted replication and extension of Field's (2001) simulation studies.
    Hafdahl AR; Williams MA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 19271846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of weighted Z-tests in medical research.
    Lan KK; Soo Y; Siu C; Wang M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 16022168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
    Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeated-measures modeling improved comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis of dependent studies.
    Siadaty MS; Philbrick JT; Heim SW; Schectman JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 57(7):698-711. PubMed ID: 15358397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Knight E; Gao H
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3655-70. PubMed ID: 15534893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis.
    Siadaty MS; Shu J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Dec; 4(1):27. PubMed ID: 15588327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assigning and combining probabilities in single-case studies.
    Manolov R; Solanas A
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):495-509. PubMed ID: 22799623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.