137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21402505)
1. Statistical estimation of EIT electrode contact impedance using magic Toeplitz matrix.
Demidenko E; Borsic A; Wan Y; Halter RJ; Hartov A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Aug; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 21402505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analytic solution to the homogeneous EIT problem on the 2D disk and its application to estimation of electrode contact impedances.
Demidenko E
Physiol Meas; 2011 Sep; 32(9):1453-71. PubMed ID: 21799240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The complete electrode model for imaging and electrode contact compensation in electrical impedance tomography.
Boverman G; Kim BS; Isaacson D; Newell JC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3462-5. PubMed ID: 18002742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methods for compensating for variable electrode contact in EIT.
Boverman G; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Dec; 56(12):2762-72. PubMed ID: 19628445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrode boundary conditions and experimental validation for BEM-based EIT forward and inverse solutions.
Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Sep; 25(9):1180-8. PubMed ID: 16967803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficient Simultaneous Reconstruction of Time-Varying Images and Electrode Contact Impedances in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Boverman G; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ; Kao TJ; Amm BC; Wang X; Davenport DM; Chong DH; Sahni R; Ashe JM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Apr; 64(4):795-806. PubMed ID: 27295649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental verification of depolarization effects in bioelectrical impedance measurement.
Chen X; Lv X; Du M
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3675-83. PubMed ID: 25227082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical impedance tomography problem with inaccurately known boundary and contact impedances.
Kolehmainen V; Lassas M; Ola P
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1404-14. PubMed ID: 18815092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography.
Yan W; Hong S; Chaoshi R
Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar; 27(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 16462015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On optimal current patterns for electrical impedance tomography.
Demidenko E; Hartov A; Soni N; Paulsen KD
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 52(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 15709661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin-electrode contact area in electrical bioimpedance spectroscopy. Influence in total body composition assessment.
Marquez JC; Seoane F; Lindecrantz K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1867-70. PubMed ID: 22254694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation.
Wagenaar J; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):922-37. PubMed ID: 27203154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new method to assess skin treatments for lowering the impedance and noise of individual gelled Ag-AgCl electrodes.
Piervirgili G; Petracca F; Merletti R
Physiol Meas; 2014 Oct; 35(10):2101-18. PubMed ID: 25243492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of composite electrode-tissue impedance.
Robinson RL; Davidson JL; Wright P; Pomfrett CJ; McCann H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1171-4. PubMed ID: 19162873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model.
Vauhkonen PJ; Vauhkonen M; Savolainen T; Kaipio JP
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Sep; 46(9):1150-60. PubMed ID: 10493078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise-robust bioimpedance approach for cardiac output measurement.
Murphy EK; Amoh J; Arshad SH; Halter RJ; Odame K
Physiol Meas; 2019 Jul; 40(7):074004. PubMed ID: 30840932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduction of edge effect on disk electrodes by optimized current waveform.
Wang B; Petrossians A; Weiland JD
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Aug; 61(8):2254-63. PubMed ID: 25051544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrical impedance spectroscopy measurements using a four-electrode configuration improve on-line monitoring of cell concentration in adherent animal cell cultures.
Sarró E; Lecina M; Fontova A; Solà C; Gòdia F; Cairó JJ; Bragós R
Biosens Bioelectron; 2012 Jan; 31(1):257-63. PubMed ID: 22061268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
