These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21402817)

  • 21. A note on the number of survey stations required in a mass casualty radiation event.
    Goans RE
    Health Phys; 2007 Dec; 93(6):705-6. PubMed ID: 17993852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Some considerations for mass casualty management in radiation emergencies.
    Hopmeier M; Abrahams J; Carr Z
    Health Phys; 2010 Jun; 98(6):790-4. PubMed ID: 20445382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using the model of resource and time-based triage (MORTT) to guide scarce resource allocation in the aftermath of a nuclear detonation.
    Casagrande R; Wills N; Kramer E; Sumner L; Mussante M; Kurinsky R; McGhee P; Katz L; Weinstock DM; Coleman CN
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2011 Mar; 5 Suppl 1():S98-110. PubMed ID: 21402818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. State-level emergency preparedness and response capabilities.
    Watkins SM; Perrotta DM; Stanbury M; Heumann M; Anderson H; Simms E; Huang M
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2011 Mar; 5 Suppl 1():S134-42. PubMed ID: 21402806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CDC Grand Rounds: radiological and nuclear preparedness.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2010 Sep; 59(36):1178-81. PubMed ID: 20847721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Role of dicentric analysis in an overarching biodosimetry strategy for use following a nuclear detonation in an urban environment.
    Blumenthal DJ; Sugarman SL; Christensen DM; Wiley AL; Livingston GK; Glassman ES; Koerner JF; Sullivan JM; Hinds S
    Health Phys; 2014 Apr; 106(4):516-22. PubMed ID: 24562072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Public health and medical preparedness for a nuclear detonation: the nuclear incident medical enterprise.
    Coleman CN; Sullivan JM; Bader JL; Murrain-Hill P; Koerner JF; Garrett AL; Weinstock DM; Case C; Hrdina C; Adams SA; Whitcomb RC; Graeden E; Shankman R; Lant T; Maidment BW; Hatchett RC
    Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 25551496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 'Just send them all to a burn centre': managing burn resources in a mass casualty incident.
    Conlon KM; Martin S
    J Bus Contin Emer Plan; 2011 Jun; 5(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 21835753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Resource allocation after a nuclear detonation incident: unaltered standards of ethical decision making.
    Caro JJ; DeRenzo EG; Coleman CN; Weinstock DM; Knebel AR
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2011 Mar; 5 Suppl 1():S46-53. PubMed ID: 21402811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nuclear terrorism and the problem of burns.
    Goffman TE
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 29(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 20825764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bioterrorism and mass casualty preparedness in hospitals: United States, 2003.
    Niska RW; Burt CW
    Adv Data; 2005 Sep; (364):1-14. PubMed ID: 16220875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The current state of affairs for disaster planning for a nuclear terrorist attack.
    Goffman TE
    Am J Disaster Med; 2009; 4(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 19378670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hospital response during the Red Dragon drill.
    Martz MD; Moulder JE; Knight-Wiegert K
    Health Phys; 2011 May; 100 Suppl 2():S56-9. PubMed ID: 21451308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electronic Mass Casualty Assessment and Planning Scenarios (EMCAPS): development and application of computer modeling to selected National Planning Scenarios for high-consequence events.
    Scheulen JJ; Thanner MH; Hsu EB; Latimer CK; Brown J; Kelen GD
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Feb; 53(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 18986730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. NIAID/NIH radiation/nuclear medical countermeasures product research and development program.
    Hafer N; Cassatt D; Dicarlo A; Ramakrishnan N; Kaminski J; Norman MK; Maidment B; Hatchett R
    Health Phys; 2010 Jun; 98(6):903-5. PubMed ID: 20445403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. U.S. national response assets for radiological incidents.
    Remick AL; Crapo JL; Woodruff CR
    Health Phys; 2005 Nov; 89(5):471-84. PubMed ID: 16217190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new handbook on triage, monitoring and treatment of people following malevolent use of radiation.
    del Rosario Pérez M; Carr Z; Rojas-Palma C; van der Meer K; Smith K; Rahola T; Muikku M; Liland A; Jaworska A; Jerstad A
    Health Phys; 2010 Jun; 98(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 20445402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiological terrorism scenarios.
    Levett J
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2007; 22(4):346. PubMed ID: 18019104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The 9-11 Commission's invitation to imagine: a pathophysiology-based approach to critical care of nuclear explosion victims.
    Manthous CA; Jackson WL
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):716-23. PubMed ID: 17255868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The state of US trauma systems: public perceptions versus reality--implications for US response to terrorism and mass casualty events.
    Champion HR; Mabee MS; Meredith JW
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Dec; 203(6):951-61. PubMed ID: 17116564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.