These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21403179)

  • 1. Quality, safety, and institutional review boards: navigating ethics and oversight in applied health systems research.
    Kass NE; Pronovost PJ
    Am J Med Qual; 2011; 26(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 21403179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An instrument to differentiate between clinical research and quality improvement.
    Ogrinc G; Nelson WA; Adams SM; O'Hara AE
    IRB; 2013; 35(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 24350502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrating research ethics and undercover hospital fieldwork.
    Herrera C
    IRB; 2000; 22(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12530447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When is research really research? Academic physicians push to keep oversight of most quality-improvement projects away from institutional review boards.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2004 Nov; LI(14):A21. PubMed ID: 15675071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical oversight in quality improvement and quality improvement research: new approaches to promote a learning health care system.
    Fiscella K; Tobin JN; Carroll JK; He H; Ogedegbe G
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):63. PubMed ID: 26383770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations.
    Gittner LS; Roach MJ; Kikano G; Grey S; Dawson NV
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 21071571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality improvement or research? The ethics of hospital project oversight.
    Morris PE; Dracup K
    Am J Crit Care; 2007 Sep; 16(5):424-6. PubMed ID: 17724233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjudicating entitlements: the emerging discourses of research ethics boards.
    Whittaker E
    Health (London); 2005 Oct; 9(4):513-35. PubMed ID: 16144791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way?
    Gold JL; Dewa CS
    Health Serv Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):291-307. PubMed ID: 15663714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to distinguish research from quality improvement.
    Cooper JA; McNair L
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):209-10. PubMed ID: 25819760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It is time to professionalize institutional review boards.
    Lantos J
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Dec; 163(12):1163-4. PubMed ID: 19996057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Report says institutional review boards are conducting inadequate reviews.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
    Lynn MR; Nelson DK
    Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Jul; 18(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 15976051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diverse ethics of translational research.
    Sofaer N; Eyal N
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):19-30. PubMed ID: 20694901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National recommendations for enhancing the conduct of ethical health research with human participants in post-disaster situations.
    Chung B; Jones L; Campbell LX; Glover H; Gelberg L; Chen DT
    Ethn Dis; 2008; 18(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 18785455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
    Kobasic DM
    J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
    Katerberg RJ
    J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.