BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21403527)

  • 1. Application of orthodontic mini-implants and ligation for absolute skeletal anchorage to the intraoral labiolingual appliance: midface distraction osteogenesis cases treated with the RED System.
    Baek SH; Seo YJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):609-13. PubMed ID: 21403527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vector control in internal midface distraction using temporary anchorage devices.
    Francis C; Rommer E; Mancho S; Carey J; Hammoudeh JA; Urata MM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2000-3. PubMed ID: 23154368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: modification of the intraoral splint in the rigid external distraction.
    Lim H; Ko EW; Lo LJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):856-8. PubMed ID: 22565908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Midfacial distraction without osteotomy using a transfacial pin and external devices.
    Coeugniet E; Dhellemmes P; Vinchon M; Wolber A; Pellerin P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):184-9. PubMed ID: 22337404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transmaxillary osteogenic distraction with intraoral tooth-borne distractors.
    Margaride LA; Breuer J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1425-7. PubMed ID: 22948655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome of early rigid fixation and removal of rigid external distraction system after distraction osteogenesis of the midface.
    Yun IS; Park BY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):576-80. PubMed ID: 21403555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Removable splint with locking attachments for maxillary distraction osteogenesis with the RED system.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 36(12):1153-7. PubMed ID: 17629458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient.
    Cha BK; Choi DS; Ngan P; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Kim SM; Jang IS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Rotterdam Palatal Distractor: introduction of the new bone-borne device and report of the pilot study.
    Koudstaal MJ; van der Wal KG; Wolvius EB; Schulten AJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 16154318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-directional Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an individual prefabricated device.
    Klammert U; Böhm H; Schweitzer T; Würzler K; Gbureck U; Reuther J; Kübler A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 37(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 19157890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multivectorial, external halo-assisted midface distraction in patients with severe hypoplasia.
    Malagon HH; Romo GW; Quintero Mosqueda FR; Magaña FG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1663-9. PubMed ID: 19098577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rigid external distraction of the midface with direct wiring of the distraction unit in patients with craniofacial dysplasia.
    Mavili ME; Tunçbilek G; Vargel I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Sep; 14(5):783-5. PubMed ID: 14501348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Le Fort III distraction: controlling position and path of the osteotomized midface segment on a rigid platform.
    Shetye PR; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1118-21. PubMed ID: 20613597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rotation advancement of the midface by distraction osteogenesis.
    Denny AD; Kalantarian B; Hanson PR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 111(6):1789-99; discussion 1800-3. PubMed ID: 12711938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual segmental distraction osteogenesis of the midface in a patient with Apert syndrome.
    Takashima M; Kitai N; Murakami S; Takagi S; Hosokawa K; Kreiborg S; Takada K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 Jul; 43(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 16854210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midface distraction osteogenesis: internal vs. external devices.
    Meling TR; Høgevold HE; Due-Tønnessen BJ; Skjelbred P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21109402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New technique: Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement and palatal distraction in 1 stage.
    Cortese A; Savastano G; Savastano M; Spagnuolo G; Papa F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 19070774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term stability of LeFort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device in a patient with Crouzon syndrome.
    Kuroda S; Watanabe K; Ishimoto K; Nakanishi H; Moriyama K; Tanaka E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):550-61. PubMed ID: 21967944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillofacial intraoral distraction osteogenesis followed by elastic traction in cleft maxillary deformity.
    Lauwers F; Mayorca-Guiliani A; Lopez R; Woisard-Bassols V; Paoli JR; Boutault F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 34(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 15617973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis using Le Fort I osteotomy without intraoperative down-fracture.
    Yamauchi K; Mitsugi M; Takahashi T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 35(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 16513321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.