653 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21403538)
21. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report].
Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An evaluation of the preservation of residual hearing with the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode.
Garcia-Ibanez L; Macias AR; Morera C; Rodriguez MM; Szyfter W; Skarszynski H; Emamdjomeh H; Baumgartner WD
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 129(6):651-64. PubMed ID: 18752086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The round window: is it the "cochleostomy" of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants.
Gudis DA; Montes M; Bigelow DC; Ruckenstein MJ
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1497-501. PubMed ID: 22972422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hearing Preservation in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.
Carlson ML; Patel NS; Tombers NM; DeJong MD; Breneman AI; Neff BA; Driscoll CLW
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e128-e133. PubMed ID: 28538468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
Neumann M; Aschendorff A; Schipper J; Laszig R; Klenzner T
Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hearing preservation surgery: cochleostomy or round window approach? A systematic review.
Havenith S; Lammers MJ; Tange RA; Trabalzini F; della Volpe A; van der Heijden GJ; Grolman W
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):667-74. PubMed ID: 23640087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An evaluation of preservation of residual hearing using the suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation: can this implantation technique be used for preservation of residual hearing?
Postelmans JT; van Spronsen E; Grolman W; Stokroos RJ; Tange RA; Maré MJ; Dreschler WA
Laryngoscope; 2011 Aug; 121(8):1794-9. PubMed ID: 21792971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of the round window membrane accessibility on hearing preservation in adult cochlear implantation.
Mirsalehi M; Mohebbi S; Ghajarzadeh M; Lenarz T; Majdani O
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 274(8):3049-3056. PubMed ID: 28589320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.
Cuda D; Murri A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4141-4148. PubMed ID: 29032420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system.
Adunka OF; Dillon MT; Adunka MC; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24557034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of preoperative, intratympanic glucocorticoids for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: a prospective clinical study.
Rajan GP; Kuthubutheen J; Hedne N; Krishnaswamy J
Laryngoscope; 2012 Jan; 122(1):190-5. PubMed ID: 22183635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Hearing preservation results after cochlear implantation in short-term and long-term observation].
Stanisławek-Sut O; Morawski K; Niemczyk K
Otolaryngol Pol; 2013; 67(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 23719269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Preservation of cochlear structures and hearing when using the Nucleus Slim Straight (CI422) electrode in children.
Skarzynski H; Matusiak M; Lorens A; Furmanek M; Pilka A; Skarzynski PH
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Apr; 130(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 26763105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A new electrode for residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: first clinical results.
Gstoettner W; Helbig S; Settevendemie C; Baumann U; Wagenblast J; Arnoldner C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 129(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 19140036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
