128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21403545)
1. Photoelastic stress analysis of different attachment systems on implant-retained and conventional palatal obturator prostheses.
do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; Alves-Rezende MC; dos Santos DM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):523-6. PubMed ID: 21403545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining.
do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; de Carvalho Dekon SF; dos Santos DM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):797-800. PubMed ID: 21558947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A photoelastic and strain gauge comparison of two attachments for obturator prostheses.
Goiato MC; Matheus HR; de Medeiros RA; Dos Santos DM; Bitencourt SB; Pesqueira AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):685-689. PubMed ID: 27881311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses, part II: photoelastic imaging.
Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; da Silva EV; Haddad MF; Moreno A; Zahoui A; dos Santos DM
J Biomed Opt; 2014 Jun; 19(6):066012. PubMed ID: 24972360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photoelastic analysis to compare implant-retained and conventional obturator dentures.
Goiato MC; Ribeiro Pdo P; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; dos Santos DM; Moreno A
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Jun; 17(6):061203. PubMed ID: 22734733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Carvalho PS; Goiato MC
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses over parallel and tilted implants: photoelastic imaging.
Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; dos Santos DM; Nobrega AS; Haddad MF; Andreotti AM; Moreno A
J Biomed Opt; 2013 Oct; 18(10):106009. PubMed ID: 24129983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses: imaging photoelastic.
Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Andreotti AM; Moreno A
J Biomed Opt; 2013 Jun; 18(6):061203. PubMed ID: 23143194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Korkmaz FM; Korkmaz YT; Yaluğ S; Korkmaz T
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants.
Pellizzer EP; Tonella BP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Alves-Rezende MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1110-3. PubMed ID: 20613577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of implant angulation with different crowns on stress distribution.
Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Sánchez DM; Rinaldi GA; de Aguirre CC; Goiato MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):434-7. PubMed ID: 21403571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnet-retained facial prosthesis combined with an implant-supported edentulous maxillary obturator: a case report.
Takahashi T; Fukuda M; Funaki K; Tanaka K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):805-7. PubMed ID: 17066645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of stability and functional stress with implant-supported maxillary obturator prostheses.
de Sousa AA; Mattos BS
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1578-84. PubMed ID: 25277029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture.
Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 15610541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
