These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Bias in the gradient-sensing response of chemotactic cells. Skupsky R; McCann C; Nossal R; Losert W J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(2):242-58. PubMed ID: 17462672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the signal transduction properties of a module of spatial sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis. Krishnan J; Iglesias PA Bull Math Biol; 2003 Jan; 65(1):95-128. PubMed ID: 12597118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gradient sensing by a bistable regulatory motif enhances signal amplification but decreases accuracy in individual cells. Sharma R; Roberts E Phys Biol; 2016 May; 13(3):036003. PubMed ID: 27171185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rescaling of Spatio-Temporal Sensing in Eukaryotic Chemotaxis. Kamino K; Kondo Y PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164674. PubMed ID: 27792738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An information-theoretic characterization of the optimal gradient sensing response of cells. Andrews BW; Iglesias PA PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Aug; 3(8):e153. PubMed ID: 17676949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A mechanism for the polarity formation of chemoreceptors at the growth cone membrane for gradient amplification during directional sensing. Bouzigues C; Holcman D; Dahan M PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9243. PubMed ID: 20179770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by cell-surface receptors. Endres RG; Wingreen NS Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2009; 100(1-3):33-9. PubMed ID: 19523978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spontaneous polarization in eukaryotic gradient sensing: a mathematical model based on mutual inhibition of frontness and backness pathways. Narang A J Theor Biol; 2006 Jun; 240(4):538-53. PubMed ID: 16343548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A mechanistic model for eukaryotic gradient sensing: spontaneous and induced phosphoinositide polarization. Subramanian KK; Narang A J Theor Biol; 2004 Nov; 231(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 15363929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physical limits on cellular sensing of spatial gradients. Hu B; Chen W; Rappel WJ; Levine H Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Jul; 105(4):048104. PubMed ID: 20867888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simulation environment for directional sensing as a phase separation process. de Candia A; Gamba A; Cavalli F; Coniglio A; Di Talia S; Bussolino F; Serini G Sci STKE; 2007 Mar; 2007(378):pl1. PubMed ID: 17374853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Receptor noise limitations on chemotactic sensing. Rappel WJ; Levine H Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Dec; 105(49):19270-5. PubMed ID: 19064934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying information transmission in eukaryotic gradient sensing and chemotactic response. Hu B; Chen W; Levine H; Rappel WJ J Stat Phys; 2011 Apr; 142(6):1167-1186. PubMed ID: 21643513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]