192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21406015)
1. Needle with a novel attachment versus conventional screw-thread needles: a preference and usability test among adults with diabetes and impaired manual dexterity.
Hansen B; Lilleøre SK; Ter-Borch G
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 May; 13(5):579-85. PubMed ID: 21406015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Needle with a novel attachment versus conventional screw-thread needles: a preference and ease-of-use test among children and adolescents with diabetes.
Hofman P; Lilleøre SK; Ter-Borch G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Nov; 5(6):1480-7. PubMed ID: 22226269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of insulin injection needles on patients' perceptions of pain, handling, and acceptability: a randomized, open-label, crossover study in subjects with diabetes.
McKay M; Compion G; Lytzen L
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Mar; 11(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 19267582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient preference for a new growth hormone injection device: results of an open-label study in Japanese pediatric patients.
Kappelgaard AM; Mikkelsen S; Knudsen TK; Fuchs GS
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2011; 24(7-8):489-96. PubMed ID: 21932587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insulin pen needles: effects of extra-thin wall needle technology on preference, confidence, and other patient ratings.
Aronson R; Gibney MA; Oza K; Bérubé J; Kassler-Taub K; Hirsch L
Clin Ther; 2013 Jul; 35(7):923-933.e4. PubMed ID: 23790553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety, simplicity and convenience of a modified prefilled insulin pen.
Sommavilla B; Jørgensen C; Jensen Kh
Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2008 Sep; 9(13):2223-32. PubMed ID: 18710348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative device assessments: Humalog KwikPen compared with vial and syringe and FlexPen.
Ignaut DA; Schwartz SL; Sarwat S; Murphy HL
Diabetes Educ; 2009; 35(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 19783767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ease of use and acceptability of a new pen device for the administration of growth hormone therapy in pediatric patients: an open-label, uncontrolled usability test.
Fuchs GS; Mikkelsen S; Knudsen TK; Kappelgaard AM
Clin Ther; 2009 Dec; 31(12):2906-14. PubMed ID: 20110030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the NovoTwist pen needle in comparison with conventional screw-thread needles.
Aye T
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Nov; 5(6):1488-9. PubMed ID: 22226270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between shorter straight and thinner microtapered insulin injection needles.
Nagai Y; Ohshige T; Arai K; Kobayashi H; Sada Y; Ohmori S; Furukawa K; Kato H; Kawata T; Ohta A; Tanaka Y
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Jul; 15(7):550-5. PubMed ID: 23621793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ease of use and patient preference injection simulation study comparing two prefilled insulin pens.
Clark PE; Valentine V; Bodie JN; Sarwat S
Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Jul; 26(7):1745-53. PubMed ID: 20482243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ease of use and preference of a new versus widely available prefilled insulin pen assessed by people with diabetes, physicians and nurses.
Oyer D; Narendran P; Qvist M; Niemeyer M; Nadeau DA
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2011 Oct; 8(10):1259-69. PubMed ID: 21905942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Injecting without pressing a button: An exploratory study of a shield-triggered injection mechanism.
Zijlstra E; Coester HV; Heise T; Plum-Mörschel L; Rasmussen O; Rikte T; Pedersen LK; Qvist M; Sparre T
Diabetes Obes Metab; 2018 May; 20(5):1140-1147. PubMed ID: 29369493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Healthcare professional and patient perceptions of a new prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe.
Lajara R; Guerrero G; Thurman J
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2012 Oct; 9(10):1181-96. PubMed ID: 22971161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient acceptance and issues of education of two durable insulin pen devices.
Asakura T; Seino H; Jensen KH
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Aug; 10(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18715204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient perceptions of injection pain and anxiety: a comparison of NovoFine 32-gauge tip 6mm and Micro Fine Plus 31-gauge 5mm needles.
Iwanaga M; Kamoi K
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Feb; 11(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 19848573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized trial on the influence of the length of two insulin pen needles on glycemic control and patient preference in obese patients with diabetes.
Kreugel G; Keers JC; Kerstens MN; Wolffenbuttel BH
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Jul; 13(7):737-41. PubMed ID: 21476936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intuitiveness, instruction time, and patient acceptance of a prefilled insulin delivery device and a reusable insulin delivery device in a randomized, open-label, crossover handling study in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Reimer T; Hohberg C; Pfützner AH; Jørgensen C; Jensen KH; Pfützner A
Clin Ther; 2008 Dec; 30(12):2252-62. PubMed ID: 19167585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.
Haak T; Edelman S; Walter C; Lecointre B; Spollett G
Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):650-60. PubMed ID: 17617288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FlexTouch® for the delivery of insulin: technical attributes and perception among patients and healthcare professionals.
Bailey T; Campos C
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2012 May; 9(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 22471783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
