167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21406326)
1. Visual and refractive outcomes following myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy with a flying-spot excimer laser.
McAlinden C; Skiadaresi E; Moore JE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 May; 37(5):901-6. PubMed ID: 21406326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of LASEK and LASIK with thin and ultrathin flaps after excimer laser ablation with the SCHWIND Aspheric ablation profile.
Arbelaez MC; Vidal C; Arba Mosquera S
J Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 27(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 20438023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of vision after myopic and hyperopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
McAlinden C; Skiadaresi E; Pesudovs K; Moore JE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jun; 37(6):1097-100. PubMed ID: 21497047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes of optimized prolate ablation and custom aspheric treatment in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Kang EC; Choi BJ; Kim EK; Kim TI
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 38(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 22340605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal limbal marking in the treatment of myopic astigmatism with the excimer laser.
Bucher C; Zuberbuhler B; Goggin M; Esterman A; Schipper I
J Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 26(7):505-11. PubMed ID: 19715268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Measurements and Clinical Outcomes After Wavefront-Guided LASEK Between iDesign and WaveScan.
Jung JW; Chung BH; Han SH; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
J Refract Surg; 2015 Jun; 31(6):398-405. PubMed ID: 26046707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous aspheric wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and phototherapeutic keratectomy to correct aberrations and refractive errors after corneal surgery.
Camellin M; Arba Mosquera S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1173-80. PubMed ID: 20610097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of higher order aberrations after implantable Collamer Lens implantation and wavefront-guided LASEK in high myopia.
Shin JY; Ahn H; Seo KY; Kim EK; Kim TI
J Refract Surg; 2012 Feb; 28(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 22074464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison.
Moshirfar M; Schliesser JA; Chang JC; Oberg TJ; Mifflin MD; Townley R; Livingston MK; Kurz CJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1336-43. PubMed ID: 20656157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transitioning to optimized correction with the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO WAVE: case distribution, visual outcomes, and wavefront aberrations.
George MR; Shah RA; Hood C; Krueger RR
J Refract Surg; 2010 Oct; 26(10):S806-13. PubMed ID: 20954675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes after topography-based LASIK and LASEK with the wavelight oculyzer and topolyzer platforms.
Cummings AB; Mascharka N
J Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 26(7):478-85. PubMed ID: 19715264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Epithelial healing and clinical outcomes in excimer laser photorefractive surgery following three epithelial removal techniques: mechanical, alcohol, and excimer laser.
Lee HK; Lee KS; Kim JK; Kim HC; Seo KR; Kim EK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 15652828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis vs laser subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopia.
de Benito-Llopis L; Teus MA; Gil-Cazorla R; Drake P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 148(6):830-6.e1. PubMed ID: 19781686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [LASEK for the correction of residual myopia and astigmatism after LASIK].
Li Y; Li JH; Zhou F
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 41(11):981-5. PubMed ID: 16318747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform.
Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18775529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis.
Townley D; Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 20070279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between three- and six-month postoperative refractive and visual results after laser epithelial keratomileusis with mitomycin C.
de Benito-Llopis L; Teus MA; Hernández-Verdejo JL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):71-76.e2. PubMed ID: 18774546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LASEK versus PRK.
Pirouzian A; Ngo S; Thornton J
Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1883. PubMed ID: 17011963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors Affecting Long-term Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Moderate Myopia.
Lim SA; Park Y; Cheong YJ; Na KS; Joo CK
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 27051256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
