375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21406629)
1. CT of the pancreas: comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images.
Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Nishibori H; Sakurai K; Miyazawa D; Watanabe H; Kondo H; Shiratori Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT
Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 21406629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality and radiation exposure in CT of the pancreas: 320-MDCT with and without adaptive iterative dose reduction versus 64-MDCT.
Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Nishibori H; Miyazawa D; Kondo H; Moriyama N; Bae KT
Clin Radiol; 2013 Nov; 68(11):e593-600. PubMed ID: 23916551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Split-bolus spectral multidetector CT of the pancreas: assessment of radiation dose and tumor conspicuity.
Brook OR; Gourtsoyianni S; Brook A; Siewert B; Kent T; Raptopoulos V
Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 23674791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abdomen: angiography with 16-detector CT--comparison of image quality and radiation dose between studies with 0.625-mm and those with 1.25-mm collimation.
Miyoshi T; Kanematsu M; Kondo H; Goshima S; Tsuge Y; Hatcho A; Shiratori Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT
Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 18796672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images?
Graser A; Johnson TR; Hecht EM; Becker CR; Leidecker C; Staehler M; Stief CG; Hildebrandt H; Godoy MC; Finn ME; Stepansky F; Reiser MF; Macari M
Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):433-40. PubMed ID: 19487466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pancreatic perfusion imaging method that reduces radiation dose and maintains image quality by combining volumetric perfusion CT with multiphasic contrast enhanced-CT.
Konno Y; Hiraka T; Kanoto M; Sato T; Tsunoda M; Ishizawa T; Matsuda A; Makino N
Pancreatology; 2020 Oct; 20(7):1406-1412. PubMed ID: 32888809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing image quality for pediatric torso computed tomography: the use of advanced iterative reconstruction and wide-detector scanning techniques.
Buchmann RF; Bruce Greenberg S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):786-9. PubMed ID: 24943252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality--reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings.
Waaijer A; Prokop M; Velthuis BK; Bakker CJ; de Kort GA; van Leeuwen MS
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):832-9. PubMed ID: 17229873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple-detector computed tomographic angiography of pancreatic neoplasm for presurgical planning: comparison of low- and high-concentration nonionic contrast media.
Ma X; Setty B; Uppot RN; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):511-7. PubMed ID: 18664834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of iodine load in CT imaging of pancreas acquired with low tube voltage and an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Noda Y; Kanematsu M; Goshima S; Kondo H; Watanabe H; Kawada H; Kawai N; Tanahashi Y; Miyoshi T; Bae KT
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 24834887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of pancreatic tumors, image quality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: effect of a low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current CT technique--preliminary results.
Marin D; Nelson RC; Barnhart H; Schindera ST; Ho LM; Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Youngblood R; Samei E
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):450-9. PubMed ID: 20656835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of compressive sensing technique in dose reduction for chest computed tomography: a prospective blinded clinical study.
Khawaja RD; Singh S; Lira D; Bippus R; Do S; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Koehler T; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):760-7. PubMed ID: 24834892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT--correlation with surgical and histopathologic results.
Chen CY; Hsu JS; Wu DC; Kang WY; Hsieh JS; Jaw TS; Wu MT; Liu GC
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):472-82. PubMed ID: 17255419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Lin XZ; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E; Chen KM; Yan FH
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement of image quality of low radiation dose abdominal CT by increasing contrast enhancement.
Watanabe H; Kanematsu M; Miyoshi T; Goshima S; Kondo H; Moriyama N; Bae KT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Oct; 195(4):986-92. PubMed ID: 20858829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pancreas: optimal scan delay for contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT.
Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Kondo H; Yokoyama R; Miyoshi T; Kato H; Tsuge Y; Shiratori Y; Hoshi H; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT
Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):167-74. PubMed ID: 16990676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
