221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21410106)
1. Non-mydriatic single-field fundus photography for the screening of retinal diseases in an executive health clinic.
Tarabishy AB; Campbell JP; Misra-Hebert A; Seballos RJ; Lang RS; Singh RP
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 21410106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a clinical setting: a comparison of direct ophthalmoscopy by primary care physicians with fundus photography.
Griffith SP; Freeman WL; Shaw CJ; Mitchell WH; Olden CR; Figgs LD; Kinyoun JL; Underwood DL; Will JC
J Fam Pract; 1993 Jul; 37(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8345340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The retinal disease screening study: retrospective comparison of nonmydriatic fundus photography and three-dimensional optical coherence tomography for detection of retinal irregularities.
Ouyang Y; Heussen FM; Keane PA; Sadda SR; Walsh AC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 54(8):5694-700. PubMed ID: 23847317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retinopathy screening in type 2 diabetes: reliability of wide angle fundus photography.
de Sonnaville JJ; van der Feltz van der Sloot D; Ernst L; Wijkel D; Heine RJ
Diabet Med; 1996 May; 13(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 8737032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Maberley D; Morris A; Hay D; Chang A; Hall L; Mandava N
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of quantitative mapping and stereoscopic fundus photography grading of retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with macular edema.
Yang Y; Vitale S; Ding Y; O'Connell SR; Alexander J; Bressler NM; Schachat AP; Zeimer R
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 12569999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
Ahmed J; Ward TP; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Vigersky RA
Diabetes Care; 2006 Oct; 29(10):2205-9. PubMed ID: 17003294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy: A hospital based observational study in Pakistan.
Fahadullah M; Memon NA; Salim S; Ahsan S; Fahim MF; Mumtaz SN; Shaikh SA; Memon MS
J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 30890831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of acute zonal occult outer retinopathy].
Song ZM; Sheng YJ; Chen QS; Xue AQ; Lin B; Li YZ; Shen LJ
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 42(8):717-23. PubMed ID: 17081444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy.
Bawankar P; Shanbhag N; K SS; Dhawan B; Palsule A; Kumar D; Chandel S; Sood S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189854. PubMed ID: 29281690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The incorporation of family physicians in the assessment of diabetic retinopathy by non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Romero P; Sagarra R; Ferrer J; Fernández-Ballart J; Baget M
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 May; 88(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 20189672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-mydriatic panoramic fundus imaging using a non-contact scanning laser-based system.
Friberg TR; Pandya A; Eller AW
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(6):488-97. PubMed ID: 14620758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
