135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21410477)
1. Social change as an important goal or likely outcome: how regulatory focus affects commitment to collective action.
Zaal MP; Van Laar C; Ståhl T; Ellemers N; Derks B
Br J Soc Psychol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 21410477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. By any means necessary: the effects of regulatory focus and moral conviction on hostile and benevolent forms of collective action.
Zaal MP; Laar CV; Ståhl T; Ellemers N; Derks B
Br J Soc Psychol; 2011 Dec; 50(4):670-89. PubMed ID: 21950478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On conviction's collective consequences: integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action.
van Zomeren M; Postmes T; Spears R
Br J Soc Psychol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):52-71. PubMed ID: 22435846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. If it matters for the group then it matters to me: collective action outcomes for seasoned activists.
Blackwood LM; Louis WR
Br J Soc Psychol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):72-92. PubMed ID: 21294752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protesters as "passionate economists": a dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage.
van Zomeren M; Leach CW; Spears R
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2012 May; 16(2):180-99. PubMed ID: 22241796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Collective efficacy and the regulatory framing of health messages: influences on concern for body image.
Johnson-Young EA; Magee RG
J Health Commun; 2014; 19(3):359-75. PubMed ID: 24377398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Respect the technique: Status-based respect increases minority group social cohesion with majority groups, while also increasing minority collective action tendencies.
Glasford DE; Johnston B
J Soc Psychol; 2018; 158(2):201-214. PubMed ID: 28481712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Goal orientation: effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams.
Porter CO
J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jul; 90(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 16060798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of individual efficacy beliefs on group goal selection and group goal commitment.
Greenlees I; Graydon J; Maynard I
J Sports Sci; 2000 Jun; 18(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 10902680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Yes, we can!": Perceptions of collective efficacy sources in volleyball.
Fransen K; Vanbeselaere N; Exadaktylos V; Vande Broek G; De Cuyper B; Berckmans D; Ceux T; De Backer M; Boen F
J Sports Sci; 2012; 30(7):641-9. PubMed ID: 22364359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flowing together: a longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups.
Salanova M; Rodríguez-Sánchez AM; Schaufeli WB; Cifre E
J Psychol; 2014; 148(4):435-55. PubMed ID: 24946388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action.
Thomas EF; McGarty C; Mavor KI
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Aug; 13(3):194-218. PubMed ID: 19622800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are we all in this together?: co-victimization,inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged.
Subašić E; Schmitt MT; Reynolds KJ
Br J Soc Psychol; 2011 Dec; 50(4):707-25. PubMed ID: 22122028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members.
Saab R; Tausch N; Spears R; Cheung WY
Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Sep; 54(3):539-60. PubMed ID: 25406712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The system-stabilizing role of identity management strategies: social creativity can undermine collective action for social change.
Becker JC
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Oct; 103(4):647-62. PubMed ID: 22746675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collective-goal ascription increases cooperation in humans.
Mitkidis P; Sørensen J; Nielbo KL; Andersen M; Lienard P
PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64776. PubMed ID: 23705011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The "I" in us, or the eye on us? Regulatory focus, commitment and derogation of an attractive alternative person.
Rodrigues D; Lopes D; Kumashiro M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174350. PubMed ID: 28319147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Working for the self or working for the group: how self- versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups.
Derks B; van Laar C; Ellemers N
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):183-202. PubMed ID: 19210074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power in group contexts: the influence of group status on promotion and prevention decision making.
Scheepers D; Ellemers N; Sassenberg K
Br J Soc Psychol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):238-54. PubMed ID: 21950319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When will collective action be effective? Violent and non-violent protests differentially influence perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy among sympathizers.
Thomas EF; Louis WR
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Feb; 40(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 24311435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
