These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21410744)

  • 1. The effects of visual degradation on face discrimination.
    McCulloch DL; Loffler G; Colquhoun K; Bruce N; Dutton GN; Bach M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 May; 31(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 21410744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association of impaired facial affect recognition with basic facial and visual processing deficits in schizophrenia.
    Norton D; McBain R; Holt DJ; Ongur D; Chen Y
    Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Jun; 65(12):1094-8. PubMed ID: 19268917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A test of face discrimination ability in aging and vision loss.
    Barnes CS; De L'Aune W; Schuchard RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Feb; 88(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 21150678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deficits in sensitivity to spacing after early visual deprivation in humans: a comparison of human faces, monkey faces, and houses.
    Robbins RA; Nishimura M; Mondloch CJ; Lewis TL; Maurer D
    Dev Psychobiol; 2010 Dec; 52(8):775-81. PubMed ID: 20564328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Face processing stages: impact of difficulty and the separation of effects.
    Latinus M; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1123(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 17054923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial localization in visual impairment.
    Subramanian A; Dickinson C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jan; 47(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16384947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vision- and health-related quality of life in patients with visual field loss after postchiasmatic lesions.
    Gall C; Lucklum J; Sabel BA; Franke GH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 50(6):2765-76. PubMed ID: 19117930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.
    Rabin J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):646-8. PubMed ID: 8113015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of reduced distance and near vision on the quality of life of adults in Timor-Leste.
    du Toit R; Palagyi A; Ramke J; Brian G; Lamoureux EL
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Dec; 117(12):2308-14. PubMed ID: 20598750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Central field perimetry of discriminated targets: I. Results for normal individuals using high-contrast targets.
    Yavuz GA; Unver YB; Bekiroglu N; Presti P; Sinclair SH
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Nov; 23(11):2082-9. PubMed ID: 19648898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Associations of visual function with physical outcomes and limitations 5 years later in an older population: the Beaver Dam eye study.
    Klein BE; Moss SE; Klein R; Lee KE; Cruickshanks KJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Apr; 110(4):644-50. PubMed ID: 12689880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of spatial frequency tuning for the recognition of facial identity and facial expressions in adults and children.
    Gao X; Maurer D
    Vision Res; 2011 Mar; 51(5):508-19. PubMed ID: 21277319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP.
    Almoqbel F; Leat SJ; Irving E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 18761477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normative contrast sensitivity values for the back-lit Melbourne Edge Test and the effect of visual impairment.
    Eperjesi F; Wolffsohn J; Bowden J; Napper G; Rubinstein M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):600-6. PubMed ID: 15491489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A nationwide population-based survey on visual acuity, near vision, and self-reported visual function in the adult population in Finland.
    Laitinen A; Koskinen S; Härkänen T; Reunanen A; Laatikainen L; Aromaa A
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2227-37. PubMed ID: 16325714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Females excel at basic face perception.
    McBain R; Norton D; Chen Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19159861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new method of assessing ability to perform activities of daily living: design, methods and baseline data.
    Lorenzana L; Lankaranian D; Dugar J; Mayer J; Palejwala N; Kulkarni K; Warrian K; Boghara Z; Richman J; Wizov S; Spaeth G; Almodin J
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2009; 16(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 19353399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of posterior capsular opacification on visual function in patients with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Elgohary MA; Beckingsale AB
    Eye (Lond); 2008 May; 22(5):613-9. PubMed ID: 17187030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of mouse cortical spatial vision.
    Prusky GT; Douglas RM
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(28):3411-8. PubMed ID: 15536009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic measures of visual function and their relationship to self-report of visual functioning.
    Freeman EE; Muñoz B; Turano KA; West SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4762-6. PubMed ID: 17065485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.