These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21410846)

  • 1. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool.
    Sirriyeh R; Lawton R; Gardner P; Armitage G
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Aug; 18(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 21410846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a new assessment tool for qualitative research articles.
    Schou L; Høstrup H; Lyngsø EE; Larsen S; Poulsen I
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Sep; 68(9):2086-94. PubMed ID: 22168459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a quality-assessment tool for experimental bruxism studies: reliability and validity.
    Dawson A; Raphael KG; Glaros A; Axelsson S; Arima T; Ernberg M; Farella M; Lobbezoo F; Manfredini D; Michelotti A; Svensson P; List T
    J Orofac Pain; 2013; 27(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 23630683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.
    Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies.
    Harrison R; Jones B; Gardner P; Lawton R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Feb; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33588842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Stiles CR; Hagen NA; Biondo PD; Cummings GG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Feb; 18(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 20698919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical appraisal tools for assessing the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies included in systematic mixed studies reviews.
    Pluye P
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):722. PubMed ID: 23279088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16539705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe.
    Klazinga N; Fischer C; ten Asbroek A
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():38-47. PubMed ID: 21737528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Qualitative research in health services research - discussion paper, Part 2: Qualitative research in health services research in Germany - an overview].
    Karbach U; Stamer M; Holmberg C; Güthlin C; Patzelt C; Meyer T;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):516-25. PubMed ID: 22941739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quality control and assessment of qualitative interview in health care research].
    Xie YM; Liao X
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Jul; 6(7):668-73. PubMed ID: 18601845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining older people's needs for care by Registered Nurses: the Nursing Needs Assessment Tool.
    Slater P; McCormack B
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Dec; 52(6):601-8. PubMed ID: 16313372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of "mixing" procedure of mixed methods in health services research.
    Zhang W; Creswell J
    Med Care; 2013 Aug; 51(8):e51-7. PubMed ID: 23860333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quality of evidence in health informatics: how did the quality of healthcare IT evaluation publications develop from 1982 to 2005?
    de Keizer NF; Ammenwerth E
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jan; 77(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17208040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a quality assessment scale for retrospective clinical studies in pediatric surgery.
    Rangel SJ; Kelsey J; Colby CE; Anderson J; Moss RL
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Mar; 38(3):390-6; discussion 390-6. PubMed ID: 12632355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases.
    Shamliyan T; Kane RL; Jansen S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 65(6):610-8. PubMed ID: 22424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the effects of using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool versus informal appraisal in assessing health research: a randomised trial.
    Crowe M; Sheppard L; Campbell A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2011 Dec; 9(4):444-9. PubMed ID: 22093394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.