760 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21411379)
1. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.
George A; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 19896599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Siedhoff MT; Carey ET; Findley AD; Riggins LE; Garrett JM; Steege JF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 23084673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy for enlarged uteri.
Kondo W; Bourdel N; Marengo F; Azuar AS; Tran-ba-Vang X; Roman H; Jardon K; Pouly JL; Rabischong B; Botchorishvili R; Mage G; Canis M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):310-3. PubMed ID: 21411380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for uterine pathology: impact of body mass index on outcomes.
O'Hanlan KA; Dibble SL; Fisher DT
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):938-41. PubMed ID: 16828849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term outcomes for super-super obese (BMI > or =60 kg/m2) patients undergoing weight loss surgery at a high-volume bariatric surgery center: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic gastric bypass, and open tubular gastric bypass.
Stephens DJ; Saunders JK; Belsley S; Trivedi A; Ewing DR; Iannace V; Capella RF; Wasielewski A; Moran S; Schmidt HJ; Ballantyne GH
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2008; 4(3):408-15. PubMed ID: 18243060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases.
Camanni M; Bonino L; Delpiano EM; Migliaretti G; Berchialla P; Deltetto F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 20619751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women: surgical technique and comparison with open surgery.
Geppert B; Lönnerfors C; Persson J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Nov; 90(11):1210-7. PubMed ID: 21854364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology: comparison between robotic assisted laparoscopy, classic laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Saceanu S; Cela V; Surlin V; Angelescu CM; Patrascu S; Georgescu I; Genazzani A
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2013; 108(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 23790783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged uterus.
Ark C; Güngördük K; Celebi I; Celikkol O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19184075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Paraiso MF; Ridgeway B; Park AJ; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Falcone T; Einarsson JI
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 208(5):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23395927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
