BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

756 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21411379)

  • 21. Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
    Mohr CJ; Nadzam GS; Curet MJ
    Arch Surg; 2005 Aug; 140(8):779-86. PubMed ID: 16103289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopic management of benign adnexal mass in obese women.
    Thomas D; Ikeda M; Deepika K; Medina C; Takacs P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 16825072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
    Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 119(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 22617585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Smorgick N; DeLancey J; Patzkowsky K; Advincula A; Song A; As-Sanie S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):581-6. PubMed ID: 22914467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic hysterectomy with conventional laparoscopic instruments in patients with symptomatic leiomyoma and/or adenomyosis.
    Phongnarisorn C; Chinthakanan O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Oct; 284(4):893-900. PubMed ID: 21116641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.
    Nezhat F; Nezhat C; Gordon S; Wilkins E
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Mar; 37(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 1532990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches.
    Orady M; Hrynewych A; Nawfal AK; Wegienka G
    JSLS; 2012; 16(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 23484561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
    David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.
    Holloway RW; Ahmad S; DeNardis SA; Peterson LB; Sultana N; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Finkler NJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Dec; 115(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 19765807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vaginal hysterectomy for benign disorders in obese women: a prospective study.
    Rafii A; Samain E; Levardon M; Darai E; Deval B
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 15663588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; von Felten S; Schär G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):604-11. PubMed ID: 22914470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trendelenburg position in gynecologic robotic-assisted surgery.
    Ghomi A; Kramer C; Askari R; Chavan NR; Einarsson JI
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 22748954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
    Schwartz RO
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
    Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese versus nonobese patients.
    Heinberg EM; Crawford BL; Weitzen SH; Bonilla DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 103(4):674-80. PubMed ID: 15051558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
    Ramirez PT; Slomovitz BM; Soliman PT; Coleman RL; Levenback C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 16472844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does obesity affect operative times and perioperative outcome of patients undergoing totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery?
    Wiedemann D; Schachner T; Bonaros N; Weidinger F; Kolbitsch C; Friedrich G; Laufer G; Bonatti J
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 19454414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Vaginal cuff closure during robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparing vicryl to barbed sutures.
    Nawfal AK; Eisenstein D; Theoharis E; Dahlman M; Wegienka G
    JSLS; 2012; 16(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 23484558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.